Literature DB >> 16231202

Scoring functions--the first 100 years.

Jeremy R H Tame1.   

Abstract

The use of simple linear mathematical models to estimate chemical properties is not a new idea. Albert Einstein used very simple 'gravity-like' forces to explain the capillarity of different liquids in 1900-1901. Today such models are used in more complicated situations, and a great many have been developed to analyse interactions between proteins and their ligands. This is not surprising, since proteins are too complicated to model accurately without lengthy numerical analysis, and simple models often do at least as good a job in predicting binding constants as much more computationally expensive methods. One hundred years after Einstein's 'miraculous year' in which he transformed physics, it is instructive to recall some of his even earlier work. As approximations, 'scoring functions' are excellent, but it is dangerous to read too much into them. A few cautionary tales are presented for the beginner to the field of ligand affinity prediction by linear models.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16231202     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-005-8483-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  14 in total

1.  Scoring functions: a view from the bench.

Authors:  J R Tame
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Thermodynamic dissection of the binding energetics of proline-rich peptides to the Abl-SH3 domain: implications for rational ligand design.

Authors:  Andrés Palencia; Eva S Cobos; Pedro L Mateo; Jose C Martínez; Irene Luque
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-02-13       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Structural parameterization of the binding enthalpy of small ligands.

Authors:  Irene Luque; Ernesto Freire
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-11-01

4.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Philippe Ferrara; Holger Gohlke; Daniel J Price; Gerhard Klebe; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Evaluation of library ranking efficacy in virtual screening.

Authors:  Maria Kontoyianni; Glenn S Sokol; Laura M McClellan
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Structure-based prediction of binding affinities and molecular design of peptide ligands.

Authors:  I Luque; E Freire
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Macromolecular shape and surface maps by solvent exclusion.

Authors:  J Greer; B L Bush
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Interior and surface of monomeric proteins.

Authors:  S Miller; J Janin; A M Lesk; C Chothia
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-08-05       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Entropy-enthalpy compensation: fact or artifact?

Authors:  K Sharp
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 10.  Regulation of transcription attenuation and translation initiation by allosteric control of an RNA-binding protein: the Bacillus subtilis TRAP protein.

Authors:  Paul Babitzke
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.934

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Virtual screening: an endless staircase?

Authors:  Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go.

Authors:  N Moitessier; P Englebienne; D Lee; J Lawandi; C R Corbeil
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Structure-based design of Aurora A & B inhibitors.

Authors:  Anders Poulsen; Anthony William; Angeline Lee; Stéphanie Blanchard; Eeling Teo; Weiping Deng; Noah Tu; Evelyn Tan; Eric Sun; Kay Lin Goh; Wai Chung Ong; Chee Pang Ng; Kee Chuan Goh; Zahid Bonday
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Unbinding of retinoic acid from the retinoic acid receptor by random expulsion molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Peter Carlsson; Sofia Burendahl; Lennart Nilsson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Binding affinity prediction with property-encoded shape distribution signatures.

Authors:  Sourav Das; Michael P Krein; Curt M Breneman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Generation of a homology model of the human histamine H(3) receptor for ligand docking and pharmacophore-based screening.

Authors:  Birgit Schlegel; Christian Laggner; Rene Meier; Thierry Langer; David Schnell; Roland Seifert; Holger Stark; Hans-Dieter Höltje; Wolfgang Sippl
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Crystal structure of unliganded TRAP: implications for dynamic allostery.

Authors:  Ali D Malay; Masahiro Watanabe; Jonathan G Heddle; Jeremy R H Tame
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Drug design for ever, from hype to hope.

Authors:  G Seddon; V Lounnas; R McGuire; T van den Bergh; R P Bywater; L Oliveira; G Vriend
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.686

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.