OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to describe our 10-year experience using MRI to evaluate response to local thermoablative interventions in the treatment of malignant liver lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted from 1998 to 2008. MRI studies were performed at 1.5 and 3 T and were acquired < 4, 4-9, and > 9 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation, and microwave ablation. MR features were evaluated on the basis of signal intensity on unenhanced T1-weighted images and the presence of ill-defined perilesional enhancement, well-defined lesional enhancement, or washout on contrast-enhanced images. Imaging features were evaluated with all interventional modalities together and separately. RESULTS: The study population was composed of 135 men and 36 women (203 ablated lesions) with a mean age of 65 years (range, 39-78 years). When the data for all treatment methods were combined, well-defined lesional enhancement and washout were significant findings among the resolved and unresolved outcome groups regardless of follow-up time category. After RFA, ablated areas had a tendency to show high signal intensity on T1 images, whereas low signal was seen after cryoablation and a hyperintense rim was seen after microwave ablation. Washout was only depicted 9 months after cryoablation but was seen in 12% of lesions < 4 months after RFA. No difference was appreciated on ill-defined perilesional enhancement with all methods combined or separately. CONCLUSION: MRI findings after ablation are dependent on the treatment modality and the length of time between the procedure and follow-up examination.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to describe our 10-year experience using MRI to evaluate response to local thermoablative interventions in the treatment of malignant liver lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted from 1998 to 2008. MRI studies were performed at 1.5 and 3 T and were acquired < 4, 4-9, and > 9 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation, and microwave ablation. MR features were evaluated on the basis of signal intensity on unenhanced T1-weighted images and the presence of ill-defined perilesional enhancement, well-defined lesional enhancement, or washout on contrast-enhanced images. Imaging features were evaluated with all interventional modalities together and separately. RESULTS: The study population was composed of 135 men and 36 women (203 ablated lesions) with a mean age of 65 years (range, 39-78 years). When the data for all treatment methods were combined, well-defined lesional enhancement and washout were significant findings among the resolved and unresolved outcome groups regardless of follow-up time category. After RFA, ablated areas had a tendency to show high signal intensity on T1 images, whereas low signal was seen after cryoablation and a hyperintense rim was seen after microwave ablation. Washout was only depicted 9 months after cryoablation but was seen in 12% of lesions < 4 months after RFA. No difference was appreciated on ill-defined perilesional enhancement with all methods combined or separately. CONCLUSION: MRI findings after ablation are dependent on the treatment modality and the length of time between the procedure and follow-up examination.
Authors: Hansjörg Rempp; Rüdiger Hoffmann; Jörg Roland; Alexandra Buck; Antje Kickhefel; Claus D Claussen; Philippe L Pereira; Fritz Schick; Stephan Clasen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-11-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Paul B Shyn; M Raquel Oliva; Shaan H Shah; Servet Tatli; Paul J Catalano; Stuart G Silverman Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-09-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Michael Praktiknjo; Viktoria Krabbe; Alessandra Pohlmann; Matthias Sampels; Christian Jansen; Carsten Meyer; Christian P Strassburg; Jonel Trebicka; Maria A Gonzalez Carmona Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Daniel Marin; Salvatore Cappabianca; Nicola Serra; Assunta Sica; Francesco Lassandro; Roberto D'Angelo; Michelearcangelo La Porta; Francesco Fiore; Francesco Somma Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 2.260