Literature DB >> 20090356

Direct trocar versus veress needle entry for laparoscopy: a randomized clinical trial.

Mahmoud S Zakherah1.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare direct trocar (DT) to Veress needle (VN) entry for the creation of pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy with regard to the duration of the procedure, volume of gas used, ease of performance, and frequency of complications.
DESIGN: A randomized clinical trial. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One thousand patients scheduled to undergo diagnostic laparoscopy were recruited for the study. They were randomly allocated to either DT entry (group A, n = 500) or VN (group B, n = 500) for pneumoperitoneum. The laparoscopic procedures were performed by the same surgeon. OUTCOMES: The duration of the procedure, volume of gas consumption, ease of performance and frequency of complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: Patients in the 2 groups had similar demographic characteristics. The mean duration of the procedure was significantly shorter in group A (2.2 +/- 0.7 min, 95% CI 2.14-2.26) than in group B (8.2 +/- 1.4 min, 95% CI 8.08-8.32; p < 0.0001). The mean gas consumption was significantly less in group A (2.6 +/- 0.9 liters, 95% CI 2.52-2.68) than in group B (8.4 +/- 2.6 liters, 95% CI 8.17-8.63; p < 0.0001). No major complications in both groups were encountered. Minor complications were significantly less in group A (0.4%, 95% CI 0.77-3.23) than in group B (14%, 95% CI 10.96-17.04; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: DT entry is a safe alternative to the VN entry technique for the creation of pneumoperitoneum. Such an approach has further advantages such as less cost and instrumentation and rapid creation of pneumoperitoneum. Copyright (c) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20090356     DOI: 10.1159/000276571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  7 in total

1.  Prospective Observational Study of Comparison Between Direct and High-Pressure Primary Trocar Entry in Gynaecological Laparoscopy in Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Geetha Balsarkar; Hemraj R Narkhede; Trupti Nadkani
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-04-27

2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of Veress needle entry versus direct trocar entry in gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Greg J Marchand; Ahmed Masoud; Alexa King; Giovanna Brazil; Hollie Ulibarri; Julia Parise; Amanda Arroyo; Catherine Coriell; Sydnee Goetz; Carmen Moir; Ashley Christensen; Tia Alexander; Malini Govindan
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 3.  Trocar Injuries in Laparoscopy: Techniques, Tools, and Means for Prevention. A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Bram Cornette; Frederik Berrevoet
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Randomized control trial on effectiveness and safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle entry techniques in obese women during diagnostic laparoscopy.

Authors:  Joseph I Ikechebelu; George U Eleje; Ngozi N Joe-Ikechebelu; Chidimma Donatus Okafor; Boniface Chukwuneme Okpala; Emmanuel O Ugwu; Cyril Emeka Nwachukwu; Chukwuemeka C Okoro; Princeston C Okam
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Laparoscopic entry techniques.

Authors:  Gaity Ahmad; Jade Baker; John Finnerty; Kevin Phillips; Andrew Watson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-18

Review 6.  Evidence-based surgery for laparoscopic appendectomy: A stepwise systematic review.

Authors:  Kovi E Bessoff; Jeff Choi; Christopher J Wolff; Aditi Kashikar; Garrison M Carlos; Luke Caddell; Rida I Khan; Christopher D Stave; David A Spain; Joseph D Forrester
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2021-08-26

7.  Direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy.

Authors:  F Agresta; G Mazzarolo; N Bedin
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.