Literature DB >> 34898900

Prospective Observational Study of Comparison Between Direct and High-Pressure Primary Trocar Entry in Gynaecological Laparoscopy in Teaching Hospital.

Geetha Balsarkar1, Hemraj R Narkhede2, Trupti Nadkani1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic port entry is crucial and vital step in any laparoscopic surgery. As laparoscopy is widely used, complications related to it are also increasing which are not seen in conventional laparotomy. AIM: The present study was undertaken to compare the ease of primary trocar entry after pneumoperitoneum at 20 mmHg pressure and direct trocar entry without pneumoperitoneum.
METHODS: Total 100 nulliparous patients who presented for elective gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery were enrolled for the study. In operating theatre, randomization of patients was done using a sealed envelope technique which divides patients into two equal groups and assigned as either low-pressure group or high-pressure group. Verres needle insertion and trocar entry was done by fellowship trainee in laparoscopy assisted by senior laparoscopy surgeon. RESULT: In high-pressure group we had trocar entry in first attempt in 80% of patient, second attempt in 20% where as in direct trocar entry group required first attempt in 88%, second attempt in 10% and third attempt in 2%. Time taken for trocar entry between two groups was significantly different requiring 4.42 ± 0.55 min for high pressure and 1.2 ± 0.28 min for direct trocar entry.
CONCLUSION: The study concluded that high-pressure trocar entry requires more time; require less attempts, easier and surgeon will be more comfortable in repeating the same technique than direct trocar entry. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynaecologic; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy; Nulliparous; Pneumoperitoneum; Trocar Entry

Year:  2021        PMID: 34898900      PMCID: PMC8617093          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-021-01471-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  11 in total

1.  An evaluation of four tests used to ascertain Veres needle placement at closed laparoscopy.

Authors:  Bobby Teoh; Rahul Sen; Jason Abbott
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  Safe technique for laparoscopic entry into the abdominal cavity.

Authors:  G M Roy; L Bazzurini; E Solima; A A Luciano
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2001-11

3.  Safe laparoscopic entry guided by Veress needle CO2 insufflation pressure.

Authors:  George A Vilos; Angelos G Vilos
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2003-08

4.  Direct trocar versus veress needle entry for laparoscopy: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mahmoud S Zakherah
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Effect of body habitus and parity on the initial Veres intraperitoneal CO2 insufflation pressure during laparoscopic access in women.

Authors:  Angelos G Vilos; George A Vilos; Basim Abu-Rafea; Jackie Hollett-Caines; Mohammad Al-Omran
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Abdominal wall characterization with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. The effect of obesity on the laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  W H Hurd; R O Bude; J O DeLancey; J M Gauvin; A M Aisen
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 0.142

7.  Comparison of two entry methods for laparoscopic port entry: technical point of view.

Authors:  Adriana Toro; Maurizio Mannino; Giovanni Cappello; Andrea Di Stefano; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2012-06-13

8.  Entry complications in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  S Krishnakumar; P Tambe
Journal:  J Gynecol Endosc Surg       Date:  2009-01

9.  Direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy.

Authors:  F Agresta; G Mazzarolo; N Bedin
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Direct trocar insertion technique: an alternative for creation of pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  K Theodoropoulou; D R Lethaby; H A Bradpiece; T L Lo; A Parihar
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.