Literature DB >> 20090064

Does computer use in patient-physician encounters influence patient satisfaction?

Sarah Lelievre1, Karen Schultz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether computer use by physicians during the patient-physician encounter influences patient satisfaction in a family medicine teaching centre.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional mailed survey.
SETTING: Queen's University Family Medicine Centre in Kingston, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 300 patients from the family medicine centre, all of whom were older than 18 years of age and had visited their family physicians in the past year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient preference for or against computer use by the physician and effect of computer use on various aspects of patient-physician interaction.
RESULTS: The response rate was 58.3%. Most respondents (51.4%) had no preference about computer use in the office, and most (88.0%) were either "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with their visits. When assessing the influence of patient and visit characteristics on computer preference, only the "doctor's attitude toward computer use" had a positive correlation with patient preference (P=.0012). Respondents were most likely to indicate "positive" or "very positive" effects of computer use on all aspects of the patient-physician interaction, except "level of distraction of the doctor" and "time spent chatting about nonmedical matters," which were most commonly reported as being unaffected by computer use. Specifically, 57.1% of respondents thought that computer use had either a "positive" or "very positive" effect on their overall satisfaction with their visits, with another 30.3% believing there was no effect.
CONCLUSION: Most patients expressed no preference for whether or not computers were used in their physicians' offices, although computers did seem to have a positive effect on overall satisfaction with visits. Doctors' attitudes toward computer use influenced their patients' preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20090064      PMCID: PMC2809189     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  9 in total

1.  If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them?

Authors:  Glenn A Loomis; J Scott Ries; Robert M Saywell; Nitesh R Thakker
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Have paper records passed their expiry date?

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97.

Authors:  E Mitchell; F Sullivan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-03

4.  21st-century health care: the effect of computer use by physicians on patient satisfaction at a family medicine clinic.

Authors:  Gregory M Garrison; Matthew E Bernard; Norman H Rasmussen
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Health information technology and physician-patient interactions: impact of computers on communication during outpatient primary care visits.

Authors:  John Hsu; Jie Huang; Vicki Fung; Nan Robertson; Holly Jimison; Richard Frankel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Dichotomy between physicians' and patients' attitudes regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters.

Authors:  C S Gadd; L E Penrod
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

7.  Patient satisfaction with time spent with their physician.

Authors:  D A Gross; S J Zyzanski; E A Borawski; R D Cebul; K C Stange
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Patients' reactions to physician use of a computerized medical record system during clinical encounters.

Authors:  J D Legler; R Oates
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  Are patients pleased with computer use in the examination room?

Authors:  G L Solomon; M Dechter
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 0.493

  9 in total
  15 in total

1.  Patient and Physician Perceptions of the Impact of Electronic Health Records on the Patient-Physician Relationship.

Authors:  Margaret Eberts; Daniel Capurro
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Knowing we practise good medicine: implementing the electronic medical record in family practice.

Authors:  Martin Dawes; David Chan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Ways of knowing.

Authors:  Nicholas Pimlott
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Impact of computer-assisted data collection, evaluation and management on the cancer genetic counselor's time providing patient care.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Dawn E McIlvried
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Physician Interactions with Electronic Health Records in Primary Care.

Authors:  Enid Montague; Onur Asan
Journal:  Health Syst (Basingstoke)       Date:  2012-12-01

Review 6.  Impact of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Patient-Doctor Relationship and Communication: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maria Alcocer Alkureishi; Wei Wei Lee; Maureen Lyons; Valerie G Press; Sara Imam; Akua Nkansah-Amankra; Deb Werner; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Technology-mediated information sharing between patients and clinicians in primary care encounters.

Authors:  Onur Asan; Enid Montague
Journal:  Behav Inf Technol       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 3.086

8.  Provider interaction with the electronic health record: the effects on patient-centered communication in medical encounters.

Authors:  Richard L Street; Lin Liu; Neil J Farber; Yunan Chen; Alan Calvitti; Danielle Zuest; Mark T Gabuzda; Kristin Bell; Barbara Gray; Steven Rick; Shazia Ashfaq; Zia Agha
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-05-14

Review 9.  Computers in the clinical encounter: a scoping review and thematic analysis.

Authors:  Noah H Crampton; Shmuel Reis; Aviv Shachak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  More screen time, less face time - implications for EHR design.

Authors:  Onur Asan; Paul D Smith; Enid Montague
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.