Literature DB >> 20084669

A new classification system for muscle and nerve preservation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Bernard T Lee1, Chen Chen, Minh-Doan Nguyen, Samuel J Lin, Adam M Tobias.   

Abstract

The main advantage of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is muscle preservation. Perforating vessels, however, display anatomic variability and intraoperative decisions must balance flap perfusion with muscle or nerve sacrifice. Studies that aggregate DIEP flap reconstruction may not accurately reflect the degree of rectus preservation. At Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2004-2009, 446 DIEP flaps were performed for breast reconstruction. Flaps were divided into three categories: DIEP-1, no muscle or nerve sacrifice (126 flaps); DIEP-2, segmental nerve sacrifice and minimal muscle sacrifice (244 flaps); DIEP-3, perforator harvest from both the medial and lateral row, segmental nerve sacrifice and central muscle sacrifice (76 flaps). Although the rate of abdominal bulge was similar among groups, fat necrosis was significantly higher in DIEP-1 when compared with DIEP-3 flaps (19.8% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.049). We describe a DIEP flap classification system and operative techniques to minimize muscle and nerve sacrifice. Copyright 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2010.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20084669     DOI: 10.1002/micr.20717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  5 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive robotic breast reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  Sarah N Bishop; Jesse C Selber
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

2.  The Use of Semi-Absorbable Mesh and its Impact on Donor-Site Morbidity and Patient-Reported Outcomes in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  L C Siegwart; L Sieber; S Fischer; Y Diehm; C Hirche; U Kneser; D Kotsougiani-Fischer
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Myth-Busting the DIEP Flap and an Introduction to the Abdominal Perforator Exchange (APEX) Breast Reconstruction Technique: A Single-Surgeon Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Frank J DellaCroce; Hannah C DellaCroce; Craig A Blum; Scott K Sullivan; Christopher G Trahan; M Whitten Wise; Irena G Brates
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Impact of Rectus Muscle Injury during Perforator Dissection on Functional Donor Morbidity after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kyeong-Tae Lee; Jin-Woo Park; Goo-Hyun Mun
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-10-29

Review 5.  Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Breast Surgery: Recent Evidence with Comparative Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Kuo Chen; Jin Zhang; Narasimha M Beeraka; Mikhail Y Sinelnikov; Xinliang Zhang; Yu Cao; Pengwei Lu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.