Literature DB >> 33634004

Minimally invasive robotic breast reconstruction surgery.

Sarah N Bishop1, Jesse C Selber1.   

Abstract

The rising popularity of robotic surgery has enabled surgeons to continue to expand the uses of robotic surgery. Robotic surgery offers minimally invasive approaches coupled with tremor elimination, up to seven degrees of freedom, ergonomic positioning, 3D magnified vision and improved resolution. We describe robotic surgery techniques for nipple-sparing mastectomies, latissimus dorsi muscle flap harvest, deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap pedicle harvest, and robotic microsurgical anastomoses. By using a robotic system the surgeon is able to offer not only a minimally invasive approach to the patient but the surgeon's ability can be improved upon as well. This improved ability is best characterized in the robotic supermicrosurgical anastomosis where even the faintest surgeon's tremor is exploited. However, within the robotic system tremor is eliminated. We are now able to offer patients a completely minimally invasive approach to ablative breast surgery and breast reconstruction. A patient could have a robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy, followed by a robotic DIEP reconstruction with a robotic microsurgical anastomosis. The patient could even have robotic lymphovenous bypass to address lymphedema that could have arisen after an axillary dissection. A completely robotic surgical approach maximizes both utilization of the robotic system and patient benefit. By using robotic techniques in flap harvest the morbidity of traditional open surgeries is minimized and the use of robotic anastomoses expands the limits of human precision. 2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator (robotic DIEP); minimally invasive breast surgery; robotic breast surgery; robotic latissimus; robotic microsurgery; robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33634004      PMCID: PMC7882313          DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  65 in total

1.  Videoendoscopic single-port nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction.

Authors:  Mustafa Tukenmez; Burcu Celet Ozden; Orhan Agcaoglu; Mustafa Kecer; Vahit Ozmen; Mahmut Muslumanoglu; Abdullah Igci
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 1.878

2.  Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Kristy L Kummerow; Liping Du; David F Penson; Yu Shyr; Mary A Hooks
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Heriberto Medina-Franco; Luis O Vasconez; R Jobe Fix; Martin J Heslin; Samuel W Beenken; Kirby I Bland; Marshall M Urist
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Transoral robotic reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects: a case series.

Authors:  Jesse C Selber
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Lymphaticovenular bypass for lymphedema management in breast cancer patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  David W Chang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Early clinical experience in endoscopic-assisted muscle flap harvest.

Authors:  N A Fine; D P Orgill; J J Pribaz
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Nipple sparing mastectomy: Surgical and oncological outcomes from a national multicentric registry with 913 patients (1006 cases) over a six year period.

Authors:  Lorenzo Orzalesi; Donato Casella; Caterina Santi; Lorenzo Cecconi; Roberto Murgo; Stefano Rinaldi; Lea Regolo; Claudio Amanti; Manuela Roncella; Margherita Serra; Graziano Meneghini; Massimiliano Bortolini; Vittorio Altomare; Carlo Cabula; Francesca Catalano; Alfredo Cirilli; Francesco Caruso; Maria Grazia Lazzaretti; Luigi Cataliotti; Marco Bernini
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.

Authors:  Maurice Y Nahabedian; Bahram Momen; Gregory Galdino; Paul N Manson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  High satisfaction rates in women after DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Tim H C Damen; Reinier Timman; Ellen H Kunst; Jessica P Gopie; Paula J C Bresser; Caroline Seynaeve; Marian B Menke-Pluijmers; Marc A M Mureau; Stefan O P Hofer; Aad Tibben
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Quality of life and patient satisfaction after microsurgical abdominal flap versus staged expander/implant breast reconstruction: a critical study of unilateral immediate breast reconstruction using patient-reported outcomes instrument BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Chunjun Liu; Yan Zhuang; Arash Momeni; Jie Luan; Michael T Chung; Eric Wright; Gordon K Lee
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  3 in total

1.  Association of Long-term Oncologic Prognosis With Minimal Access Breast Surgery vs Conventional Breast Surgery.

Authors:  Andi Wan; Yan Liang; Li Chen; Shushu Wang; Qiyun Shi; Wenting Yan; Xiaozhen Cao; Ling Zhong; Linjun Fan; Peng Tang; Guozhi Zhang; Siyi Xiong; Cheng Wang; Zhen Zeng; Xiujuan Wu; Jun Jiang; Xiaowei Qi; Yi Zhang
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 16.681

Review 2.  A Tale of Two Cancers: A Current Concise Overview of Breast and Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Franklyn De Silva; Jane Alcorn
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Breast Surgery: Recent Evidence with Comparative Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Kuo Chen; Jin Zhang; Narasimha M Beeraka; Mikhail Y Sinelnikov; Xinliang Zhang; Yu Cao; Pengwei Lu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.