Literature DB >> 30097717

Public perception of climatological tornado risk in Tennessee, USA.

Kelsey N Ellis1, Lisa Reyes Mason2, Kelly N Gassert3, James B Elsner4, Tyler Fricker4.   

Abstract

The southeastern United States experiences some of the greatest tornado fatality rates in the world, with a peak in the western portion of the state of Tennessee. Understanding the physical and social characteristics of the area that may lead to increased fatalities is a critical research need. Residents of 12 Tennessee counties from three regions of the state (N = 1804) were asked questions about their perception of climatological tornado risk in their county. Approximately half of participants underestimated their local tornado risk calculated from 50 years of historical tornado data. The percentage of participants underestimating their climatological risk increased to 81% when using model estimates of tornado frequencies that account for likely missed tornadoes. A mixed effects, ordinal logistic regression model suggested that participants with prior experience with tornadoes are more likely to correctly estimate or overestimate (rather than underestimate) their risk compared to those lacking experience (β = 0.52, p < 0.01). Demographic characteristics did not have a large influence on the accuracy of climatological tornado risk perception. Areas where more tornadoes go unreported may be at a disadvantage for understanding risk because residents' prior experience is based on limited observations. This work adds to the literature highlighting the importance of personal experiences in determining hazard risk perception and emphasizes the uniqueness of tornadoes, as they may occur in rural areas without knowledge, potentially prohibiting an accumulation of experiences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Climatology; Population bias; Prior experience; Risk; Tornado

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30097717     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-018-1547-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  6 in total

Review 1.  The risk perception paradox--implications for governance and communication of natural hazards.

Authors:  Gisela Wachinger; Ortwin Renn; Chloe Begg; Christian Kuhlicke
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Perception of risk.

Authors:  P Slovic
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Exploring the effect of a middle response category on response style in attitude measurement.

Authors:  Guy Moors
Journal:  Qual Quant       Date:  2007-02-16

Review 4.  Gender differences in risk perception: theoretical and methodological perspectives.

Authors:  P E Gustafson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks.

Authors:  J Flynn; P Slovic; C K Mertz
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Statistical Models for Tornado Climatology: Long and Short-Term Views.

Authors:  James B Elsner; Thomas H Jagger; Tyler Fricker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.