Literature DB >> 20083757

Improved bariatric surgery outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries after implementation of the medicare national coverage determination.

Ninh T Nguyen1, Samuel Hohmann, Johnathan Slone, Esteban Varela, Brian R Smith, David Hoyt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of Medicare beneficiaries who underwent bariatric surgery within 18 months before and after implementation of the national coverage determination (NCD) for bariatric surgery.
DESIGN: Analysis of the University HealthSystem Consortium database from October 1, 2004, through September 31, 2007.
SETTING: A total of 102 academic medical centers and approximately 150 of their affiliated hospitals, representing more than 90% of the nation's nonprofit academic medical centers. PATIENTS: Medicare and Medicaid patients who underwent bariatric surgery to treat morbid obesity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics, length of stay, 30-day readmission, morbidity, observed-to-expected mortality ratio, and costs.
RESULTS: A total of 3196 bariatric procedures were performed before and 3068 after the NCD. After the implementation of the NCD, the volume of gastric banding doubled and the proportion of laparoscopic gastric bypass increased from 60.0% to 77.2%. Patients who underwent bariatric surgery after the NCD benefited from a shorter length of stay (3.5 vs 3.1 days, P < .001) and lower overall complication rates (12.2% vs 10.0%, P < .001), with no significant differences in the in-hospital mortality rates (0.28% vs 0.20%). Among Medicare patients, there was a 29.3% reduction in the number of bariatric procedures performed within the first 2 quarters after the NCD. However, the number of procedures returned to baseline volume within 1 year and exceeded baseline volume after 2 years of the NCD.
CONCLUSION: The bariatric surgery NCD resulted in improved outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries without limiting access to care for individuals with medical disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20083757     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  13 in total

1.  Why We Should Not Be Indifferent to Specification Choices for Difference-in-Differences.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; James F Burgess; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The effect of health system factors on outcomes and costs after bariatric surgery in a universal healthcare system: a national cohort study of bariatric surgery in Canada.

Authors:  Aristithes G Doumouras; Fady Saleh; Sama Anvari; Scott Gmora; Mehran Anvari; Dennis Hong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The effect of the Ontario Bariatric Network on health services utilization after bariatric surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ahmad Elnahas; Timothy D Jackson; Allan Okrainec; Peter C Austin; Chaim M Bell; David R Urbach
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-09-14

4.  Bariatric Surgery Among Medicare Subgroups: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Elizaveta Walker; Miriam Elman; Erin E Takemoto; Erin Fennern; James E Mitchell; Walter J Pories; Bestoun Ahmed; Alfons Pomp; Bruce M Wolfe
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Hospital-acquired conditions after bariatric surgery: we can predict, but can we prevent?

Authors:  Anne O Lidor; Erin Moran-Atkin; Miloslawa Stem; Thomas H Magnuson; Kimberley E Steele; Richard Feinberg; Michael A Schweitzer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Bariatric surgery complications before vs after implementation of a national policy restricting coverage to centers of excellence.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Lauren H Nicholas; Andrew M Ryan; Jyothi R Thumma; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The impact of accreditation on safety and cost of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Steve Kwon; Bruce Wang; Edwin Wong; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Sean D Sullivan; David R Flum
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 4.734

8.  Does pay-for-performance improve surgical outcomes? An evaluation of phase 2 of the Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration.

Authors:  Terry Shih; Lauren H Nicholas; Jyothi R Thumma; John D Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Racial differences among patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a population-based trend analysis from 2002 to 2008.

Authors:  Mathias Worni; Ulrich Guller; Matthew L Maciejewski; Lesley H Curtis; Mihir Gandhi; Ricardo Pietrobon; Danny O Jacobs; Truls Østbye
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  A population-based, shared decision-making approach to recruit for a randomized trial of bariatric surgery versus lifestyle for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  David Arterburn; David R Flum; Emily O Westbrook; Sharon Fuller; Mary Shea; Steven N Bock; Jeffrey Landers; Katie Kowalski; Emily Turnbull; David E Cummings
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 4.734

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.