Aristithes G Doumouras1,2, Fady Saleh3, Sama Anvari3, Scott Gmora4,3, Mehran Anvari4,3, Dennis Hong4,3. 1. Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. aristithes.doumouras@medportal.ca. 2. Division of General Surgery, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada. aristithes.doumouras@medportal.ca. 3. Division of General Surgery, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada. 4. Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Previous data demonstrate that patients who receive bariatric surgery at a Center of Excellence are different than those who receive care at non-accredited centers. Canada provides a unique opportunity to naturally exclude confounders such as insurance status, hospital ownership, and lack of access on comparisons between hospitals and surgeons in bariatric surgery outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of hospital accreditation and other health system factors on all-cause morbidity after bariatric surgery in Canada. METHODS: This was a population-based study of all patients aged ≥18 who received a bariatric procedure in Canada (excluding Quebec) from April 2008 until March 2015. The main outcomes for this study were all-cause morbidity and costs during the index admission. All-cause morbidity included any documented complication which extended length of stay by 24 h or required reoperation. Risk-adjusted hierarchical regression models were used to determine predictors of morbidity and cost. RESULTS: Overall, 18,398 patients were identified and the all-cause morbidity rate was 10.1%. Surgeon volume and teaching hospitals were both found to significantly decrease the odds of all-cause morbidity. Specifically, for each increase in 25 bariatric cases per year, the odds of all-cause morbidity was 0.94 times lower (95% CI 0.87-1.00, p = 0.03). Teaching hospitals conferred a 0.75 lower odds of all-cause morbidity (95% CI 0.58-0.95, p < 0.001). Importantly, formal accreditation was not associated with a decrease in all-cause morbidity within a universal healthcare system. No health system factors were associated with significant cost differences. CONCLUSION: This national cohort study found that surgeon volume and teaching hospitals predicted lower all-cause morbidity after surgery while hospital accreditation was not a significant factor.
INTRODUCTION: Previous data demonstrate that patients who receive bariatric surgery at a Center of Excellence are different than those who receive care at non-accredited centers. Canada provides a unique opportunity to naturally exclude confounders such as insurance status, hospital ownership, and lack of access on comparisons between hospitals and surgeons in bariatric surgery outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of hospital accreditation and other health system factors on all-cause morbidity after bariatric surgery in Canada. METHODS: This was a population-based study of all patients aged ≥18 who received a bariatric procedure in Canada (excluding Quebec) from April 2008 until March 2015. The main outcomes for this study were all-cause morbidity and costs during the index admission. All-cause morbidity included any documented complication which extended length of stay by 24 h or required reoperation. Risk-adjusted hierarchical regression models were used to determine predictors of morbidity and cost. RESULTS: Overall, 18,398 patients were identified and the all-cause morbidity rate was 10.1%. Surgeon volume and teaching hospitals were both found to significantly decrease the odds of all-cause morbidity. Specifically, for each increase in 25 bariatric cases per year, the odds of all-cause morbidity was 0.94 times lower (95% CI 0.87-1.00, p = 0.03). Teaching hospitals conferred a 0.75 lower odds of all-cause morbidity (95% CI 0.58-0.95, p < 0.001). Importantly, formal accreditation was not associated with a decrease in all-cause morbidity within a universal healthcare system. No health system factors were associated with significant cost differences. CONCLUSION: This national cohort study found that surgeon volume and teaching hospitals predicted lower all-cause morbidity after surgery while hospital accreditation was not a significant factor.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bariatric surgery; Health services; Outcomes
Authors: Pamela S Kim; Dana A Telem; Maria S Altieri; Mark Talamini; Jie Yang; Qiao Zhang; Aurora D Pryor Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Mehraneh D Jafari; Fariba Jafari; Monica T Young; Brian R Smith; Michael J Phalen; Ninh T Nguyen Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-08-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Terry Shih; Adam I Cole; Paul M Al-Attar; Apurba Chakrabarti; Hussein A Fardous; Peter F Helvie; Michael T Kemp; Chris Lee; Eytan Shtull-Leber; Darrell A Campbell; Michael J Englesbe Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Aristithes G Doumouras; Fady Saleh; Sama Anvari; Scott Gmora; Mehran Anvari; Dennis Hong Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Alfredo M Carbonell; Amy E Lincourt; Brent D Matthews; Kent W Kercher; Ronald F Sing; B Todd Heniford Journal: Am Surg Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Kyle D Hunt; Aristithes G Doumouras; Yung Lee; Scott Gmora; Mehran Anvari; Dennis Hong Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Jerry T Dang; Iran Tavakoli; Noah Switzer; Valentin Mocanu; Xinzhe Shi; Chris de Gara; Daniel W Birch; Shahzeer Karmali Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 2.089