BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery (LGBS) has become the most widely used bariatric procedure due to its beneficial long-term outcomes for patients with morbid obesity. However, it is unclear whether racial differences in admission for LGBS have changed over time compared to racial differences in all other admissions. We aimed to investigate the trends and differences in the use of LGBS among white, African-American, and Hispanic patients from 2002 to 2008. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data on obese adult patients operated between 2002 and 2008, using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. The probability of being admitted for LGBS was estimated using logistic regression with race, year, and year by race interaction as predictors, controlling for numerous patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Among 1,704,972 obese hospitalized patients captured through NIS from 2002 to 2008, 2.6 % underwent LGBS (2.8 % Whites, 1.7 % African-Americans, and 2.6 % Hispanics). In adjusted analysis, obese African-American (OR 0.48, p < 0.001) and Hispanic patients (OR 0.59, p < 0.001) were less likely to be admitted for LGBS than white patients in 2002. Race-year interactions showed that the odds of African-Americans undergoing LGBS significantly increased from 2002 to 2008 compared with Whites (annual OR 1.03, p < 0.001) while no such increase was detected for Hispanics (annual OR 1.02, p = 0.11). In 2008, African-American (OR 0.58, p < 0.001) and Hispanic patients (OR 0.65, p < 0.001) still had lower odds than white patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study showing that the difference in the use of LGBS between obese African-American and white patients declined between 2002 and 2008. However, LGBS use still remained significantly lower for both African-American and Hispanic patients in 2008 compared with white patients.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery (LGBS) has become the most widely used bariatric procedure due to its beneficial long-term outcomes for patients with morbid obesity. However, it is unclear whether racial differences in admission for LGBS have changed over time compared to racial differences in all other admissions. We aimed to investigate the trends and differences in the use of LGBS among white, African-American, and Hispanic patients from 2002 to 2008. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data on obese adult patients operated between 2002 and 2008, using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. The probability of being admitted for LGBS was estimated using logistic regression with race, year, and year by race interaction as predictors, controlling for numerous patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Among 1,704,972 obese hospitalized patients captured through NIS from 2002 to 2008, 2.6 % underwent LGBS (2.8 % Whites, 1.7 % African-Americans, and 2.6 % Hispanics). In adjusted analysis, obese African-American (OR 0.48, p < 0.001) and Hispanic patients (OR 0.59, p < 0.001) were less likely to be admitted for LGBS than white patients in 2002. Race-year interactions showed that the odds of African-Americans undergoing LGBS significantly increased from 2002 to 2008 compared with Whites (annual OR 1.03, p < 0.001) while no such increase was detected for Hispanics (annual OR 1.02, p = 0.11). In 2008, African-American (OR 0.58, p < 0.001) and Hispanic patients (OR 0.65, p < 0.001) still had lower odds than white patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study showing that the difference in the use of LGBS between obese African-American and white patients declined between 2002 and 2008. However, LGBS use still remained significantly lower for both African-American and Hispanic patients in 2008 compared with white patients.
Authors: Matthew L Maciejewski; Edward H Livingston; Valerie A Smith; Andrew L Kavee; Leila C Kahwati; William G Henderson; David E Arterburn Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-06-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Janice F Bell; Frederick J Zimmerman; David E Arterburn; Matthew L Maciejewski Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Alfredo M Carbonell; Amy E Lincourt; Brent D Matthews; Kent W Kercher; Ronald F Sing; B Todd Heniford Journal: Am Surg Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Ronald R Grunstein; Kaj Stenlöf; Jan A Hedner; Markku Peltonen; Kristjan Karason; Lars Sjöström Journal: Sleep Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Nancy Puzziferri; Paul A Nakonezny; Edward H Livingston; Thomas J Carmody; David A Provost; A John Rush Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Sanjit K Bhogal; Jacinta I Reddigan; Ori D Rotstein; Ashley Cohen; Dresden Glockler; Andrea C Tricco; Janet K Smylie; Stephen A Glazer; Jason Pennington; Lesley Gotlib Conn; Timothy D Jackson Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: G Craig Wood; Daniel Horwitz; Christopher D Still; Tooraj Mirshahi; Peter Benotti; Manish Parikh; Annemarie G Hirsch Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Andrea Balla; Gabriela Batista Rodríguez; Santiago Corradetti; Carmen Balagué; Sonia Fernández-Ananín; Eduard M Targarona Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2017-08-05 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Fatih Mehmet Yazar; Arif Emre; Sami Akbulut; Aykut Urfalıoğlu; Emrah Cengiz; Mehmet Sertkaya; Hüseyin Yıldız; Ertan Bülbüloğlu Journal: Indian J Surg Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 0.656