Literature DB >> 20080324

Mechanical properties of glenoid cancellous bone.

Ibrahim Kalouche1, Jérôme Crépin, Samir Abdelmoumen, David Mitton, Geneviève Guillot, Olivier Gagey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Loosening of the glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty is the main late complication of this procedure; it may be assumed that it is highly dependent on the quality of the glenoid cancellous bone. Very little is known about the mechanical properties of this cancellous bone. The aim of this study was to determine these properties (Young's modulus and strength) as well as bone density in different parts of the glenoid cancellous bone to assess their variations.
METHODS: Eleven scapulas were obtained from six fresh-frozen, unembalmed human cadavers. Eighty-two cubic cancellous bone specimens were extracted and tested using a uniaxial compression test; then the specimens were defatted and correlations with bone density were determined.
FINDINGS: The study showed significant differences in the mechanical properties with anatomic location and directions of loading. Young's modulus and strength were found to be significantly higher at the posterior part of the glenoid with the weakest properties at the antero-inferior part. Cancellous bone was found to be anisotropic with higher mechanical properties in the latero-medial direction perpendicular to the articular surface of the glenoid. The apparent density was on average equal to 0.29 g/cm(3) with the higher values at the posterior and superior part of the glenoid. Good correlation between apparent density and elastic modulus was found only in the sagittal planes but not in the coronal and axial plane.
INTERPRETATION: The mechanical properties determined in this study showed the anisotropy of the glenoid cancellous bone; values of these properties could provide input data for finite element method analyses in shoulder prosthesis designs. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20080324     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  8 in total

1.  Maximum load to failure and tensile displacement of an all-suture glenoid anchor compared with a screw-in glenoid anchor.

Authors:  Tim Dwyer; Thomas L Willett; Andrew P Dold; Massimo Petrera; David Wasserstein; Danny B Whelan; John S Theodoropoulos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Multi-patient finite element simulation of keeled versus pegged glenoid implant designs in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Werner Pomwenger; Karl Entacher; Herbert Resch; Peter Schuller-Götzburg
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Analysis of glenoid inter-anchor distance with an all-suture anchor system.

Authors:  Jonathan D Kramer; Sean Robinson; Connor Purviance; William Montgomery
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-02

4.  The Effect of Torque Differences for All-Suture Anchor Fixation Strength: A Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Lucca Lacheta; Jon Miles; Brenton Douglass; Peter Millett
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-25

5.  Stability of small pegs for cementless implant fixation.

Authors:  Diogo M Geraldes; Ulrich Hansen; Jonathan Jeffers; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Standardizing compression testing for measuring the stiffness of human bone.

Authors:  S Zhao; M Arnold; S Ma; R L Abel; J P Cobb; U Hansen; O Boughton
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 7.  Methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review.

Authors:  Fangxing Wang; Leyu Zheng; Jan Theopold; Stefan Schleifenbaum; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde; Georg Osterhoff
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Impact of screw length and screw quantity on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty glenoid fixation for 2 different sizes of glenoid baseplates.

Authors:  Christopher Roche; Caitlin DiGeorgio; Jose Yegres; Jennifer VanDeven; Nick Stroud; Pierre-Henri Flurin; Thomas Wright; Emilie Cheung; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-11-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.