Literature DB >> 20078753

Self-organisation, integration and curriculum in the complex world of medical education.

Stewart Mennin1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The world of medical education is more complex than ever and there seems to be no end in sight. Complexity science is particularly relevant as medical education embraces a movement towards more authentic curricula focusing on integration, interactive small-group learning, and early and sustained clinical and community experiences. DISCUSSION: A medical school as a whole, and the expression of its curriculum through the interactions, exchanges and learning that take place within and outside of it, is a complex system. Complexity science, a derivative of the natural sciences, is the study of the dynamics, conditions and consequences of interactions. It addresses the nature of the conditions favourable to change and transformation (learning).
CONCLUSIONS: The core process of complexity, self-organisation, requires a system that is open and far from equilibrium, with ill-defined boundaries and a large number of non-linear interactions involving short-loop feedback. In such a system, knowledge does not exist objectively 'out there'; rather, it exists as a result of the exchange between participants, an action that becomes knowing. Understanding is placed between participants rather than being contained in one or the other. Knowledge is not constructed separately in the mind of the knower, but, rather, it emerges; it is co-created during the exchange in an authentic recursive transactive process. Learning and knowing become adaptive responses to continuously evolving circumstances. An approach to curriculum based on self-organisation is characterised as rich, recursive, relational and rigorous and it illuminates how a curriculum can be understood as a complex adaptive system. The perspective of complexity applied to medical education broadens and enriches research questions relevant to health professions education. It focuses our attention onto how we are together as human beings. How we respond to and frame the issues of learning and understanding that challenge contemporary medicine and, by extension, medical education, in a complex and rapidly changing world can have profound effects on the preparedness of tomorrow's health professionals and their impact on society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20078753     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03548.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  27 in total

1.  Objective structured brainstorming questions (OSBQs) in PBL tutorial sessions: Evidence based pilot study.

Authors:  Ibrahim A Alhoqail; Fouad M Badr
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2010-11

2.  Understanding the Mentoring Environment Through Thematic Analysis of the Learning Environment in Medical Education: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jia Min Hee; Hong Wei Yap; Zheng Xuan Ong; Simone Qian Min Quek; Ying Pin Toh; Stephen Mason; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Students' perceptions of patient safety during the transition from undergraduate to postgraduate training: an activity theory analysis.

Authors:  Jeantine M de Feijter; Willem S de Grave; Tim Dornan; Richard P Koopmans; Albert J J A Scherpbier
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.853

4.  Participating in a Community of Learners enhances resident perceptions of learning in an e-mentoring program: proof of concept.

Authors:  Timona Obura; William E Brant; Fiona Miller; I John Parboosingh
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Preparing to prescribe: How do clerkship students learn in the midst of complexity?

Authors:  Lucy McLellan; Sarah Yardley; Ben Norris; Anique de Bruin; Mary P Tully; Tim Dornan
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 3.853

6.  Remediation of at-risk medical students: theory in action.

Authors:  Kalman A Winston; Cees P M Van Der Vleuten; Albert J J A Scherpbier
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Visual analytics in healthcare education: exploring novel ways to analyze and represent big data in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  Christos Vaitsis; Gunnar Nilsson; Nabil Zary
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 8.  Emergence: complexity pedagogy in action.

Authors:  Christine Jonas-Simpson; Gail Mitchell; Nadine Cross
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2015-03-09

9.  Beyond knowledge and skills: the use of a Delphi study to develop a technology-mediated teaching strategy.

Authors:  Michael Rowe; Jose Frantz; Vivienne Bozalek
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Program directors' reflections on national policy change in medical education: insights on decision-making, accreditation, and the CanMEDS framework.

Authors:  Kelly L Dore; Bryce Jm Bogie; Karen Saperson; Karen Finlay; Parveen Wasi
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2021-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.