Literature DB >> 20073551

Effect of prostate gland size on the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does size matter initially?

Carlos H Martínez1, Venu Chalasani, Darwin Lim, Linda Nott, Reem J Al-Bareeq, Geoffrey R Wignall, Larry Stitt, Stephen E Pautler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Widespread introduction of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) has led to multiple surgeons going through the learning curve (LC). One of the recommendations for surgeons on the LC for RALRP is to choose patients with smaller glands. We evaluated our LCs to determine whether prostate size influenced intraoperative outcomes and positive surgical margin rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from a prospective database for the first 154 cases of RALRP performed by a single surgeon. Patients were divided into three groups based on prostate volume (PV): <40 cc (group 1), 40 to 60 cc (group 2), or >60 cc (group 3). PV was estimated by preoperative transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and correlated with pathologic weight (PW). Perioperative and immediate postoperative outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in total operative times between the groups (206 minutes vs 201 minutes vs 233 minutes for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively) was noted. With regard to individual intraoperative steps, the bladder neck reconstruction and anastomosis time was longer in group 3. No other statistically significant differences were noted. The Pearson correlation coefficient between PV estimation by TRUS and PW was r = 0.785, and an additional analysis based on PW supports the results of our study.
CONCLUSIONS: Prostate size influenced total operative times and the bladder neck reconstruction and anastomosis time. Our data support the use of preoperative TRUS to estimate PV and recommendations for surgeons starting on their LC to choose glands less than 60 cc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20073551     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  8 in total

1.  Clinical factors affecting perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Tomohiko Murakami; Satoshi Otsubo; Ryo Namitome; Masaki Shiota; Junichi Inokuchi; Ario Takeuchi; Eiji Kashiwagi; Katsunori Tatsugami; Masatoshi Eto
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-09-13

2.  Robotic-assisted perineal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: A matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Volkan Tuğcu; Oktay Akça; Abdulmuttalip Şimşek; İsmail Yiğitbaşı; Selçuk Şahin; Mustafa Gürkan Yenice; Ali İhsan Taşçı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-04-03

3.  Predictive factors for return of erectile function in robotic radical prostatectomy: case series from a single centre.

Authors:  F J Garcia; P D Violette; G B Brock; S E Pautler
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  Impact of a preoperatively estimated prostate volume using transrectal ultrasonography on surgical and oncological outcomes in a single surgeon's experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yosuke Hirasawa; Yoshio Ohno; Jun Nakashima; Kenji Shimodaira; Takeshi Hashimoto; Tatsuo Gondo; Makoto Ohori; Masaaki Tachibana; Kunihiko Yoshioka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Independent predictors of prolonged operative time during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Philippe D Violette; David Mikhail; Gregory R Pond; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-02-12

6.  Predictors of Prolonged Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and the Creation of a Scoring System for the Duration.

Authors:  Shao-Hao Chen; Zhi-Bin Ke; Yu-Peng Wu; Dong-Ning Chen; Xiang Yu; Yu Chen; Yong Wei; Qing-Shui Zheng; Xue-Yi Xue; Ning Xu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  Impact of protruded median lobe on perioperative, urinary continence and oncological outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jiajun Qian; Yao Fu; Xiao Wu; Liu Xu; Mengjie Zhang; Qing Zhang; Joel Elliot Rosenberg; Linfeng Xu; Xuefeng Qiu; Hongqian Guo
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-02

Review 8.  Impact of Prostate Size on the Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Omar Fahmy; Nabil A Alhakamy; Osama A A Ahmed; Mohd Ghani Khairul-Asri
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.