Literature DB >> 26531111

Independent predictors of prolonged operative time during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Philippe D Violette1, David Mikhail2, Gregory R Pond3, Stephen E Pautler4,5,6.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the determinants of prolonged operative time during robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) after the learning curve period. Data were prospectively collected from consecutive patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer who underwent RARP at an academic institution from 2006 to 2012. The early learning curve period of 40 patients was excluded. Primary outcome was prolonged operative time, defined as greater than one standard deviation above the mean. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of prolonged operative time, and multivariable linear regression further quantified their impact. The mean age of the 440 men included in this cohort was 60 ± 7 years, with a PSA of 7 ± 3 and BMI and IIEF scores of 27 ± 3 and 17 ± 8, respectively. Seventy-one percent of patients had Stage 1 disease, the majority of which underwent bilateral (62%) or unilateral (21%) nerve-sparing prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (49%). The mean complete operative time was 187 ± 32 min. Multivariable logistic regression revealed four independent predictors of prolonged operative time: blood loss, pre-operative PSA, robot malfunction, and gland volume. Operative time was most strongly affected by procedure-specific variables, including robotic malfunction (32 min/malfunction) and blood loss (6.5 min/100 ml). Operative time was also affected to a lesser degree by patient-specific variables of PSA (10 min/10 ng/ml) and gland volume (3 min/10 cc). Robotic malfunction was the strongest predictor of prolonged operative time. Blood loss, PSA, and gland volume were also associated with prolonged operative time. Knowledge of these predictors may assist in surgical planning and improve resource utilization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Learning curve; Operating time; Resource use; Robotic malfunction; Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26531111     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-015-0497-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  29 in total

1.  Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  J Binder; W Kramer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Malfunction of the da Vinci robotic system in urology.

Authors:  Cheng-Che Chen; Yen-Chuan Ou; Cheng-Kuang Yang; Kun-Yuan Chiu; Shian-Shiang Wang; Chung-Kuang Su; Hao-Chung Ho; Chen-Li Cheng; Chuan-Shu Chen; Jian-Ri Lee; Wen-Min Chen
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.369

3.  New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Gabriel I Barbash; Sherry A Glied
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Robotic equipment malfunction during robotic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Hugh J Lavery; Rahul Thaly; David Albala; Thomas Ahlering; Arieh Shalhav; David Lee; Randy Fagin; Peter Wiklund; Prokar Dasgupta; Anthony J Costello; Ashutosh Tewari; Geoff Coughlin; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Predictors of costs for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Christian Bolenz; Amit Gupta; Claus G Roehrborn; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Predictors of prolonged operative time during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Daniel Z Yong; Matvey Tsivian; Dorit E Zilberman; Michael N Ferrandino; Vladimir Mouraviev; David M Albala
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologists in the United States.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; James A Eastham; Caroline Savage; A C Maschino; Vincent P Laudone; Christopher B Dechet; Robert A Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Effect of prostate gland size on the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does size matter initially?

Authors:  Carlos H Martínez; Venu Chalasani; Darwin Lim; Linda Nott; Reem J Al-Bareeq; Geoffrey R Wignall; Larry Stitt; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Brian A Link; Rebecca Nelson; David Y Josephson; Jeffrey S Yoshida; Laura E Crocitto; Mark H Kawachi; Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review.

Authors:  Kamran Ahmed; Amel Ibrahim; Tim T Wang; Nuzhath Khan; Ben Challacombe; Muhammed Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  4 in total

1.  Development of a Patient-Based Model for Estimating Operative Times for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Neil B Huben; Ahmed A Hussein; Paul R May; Michelle Whittum; Collin Krasowski; Youssef E Ahmed; Zhe Jing; Hijab Khan; Hyung L Kim; Thomas Schwaab; Willie Underwood; Eric C Kauffman; James L Mohler; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Predictors of Prolonged Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and the Creation of a Scoring System for the Duration.

Authors:  Shao-Hao Chen; Zhi-Bin Ke; Yu-Peng Wu; Dong-Ning Chen; Xiang Yu; Yu Chen; Yong Wei; Qing-Shui Zheng; Xue-Yi Xue; Ning Xu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 3.  Complications in robotic urological surgeries and how to avoid them: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rafael Rocha Tourinho-Barbosa; Marcos Tobias-Machado; Adalberto Castro-Alfaro; Gabriel Ogaya-Pinies; Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-12-14

4.  Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy versus open simple prostatectomy: a single-center comparison.

Authors:  R Dotzauer; A La Torre; A Thomas; M P Brandt; K Böhm; R Mager; H Borgmann; W Jäger; M Kurosch; T Höfner; C Ruckes; A Haferkamp; I Tsaur
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 4.226

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.