Literature DB >> 20072744

Maxillary arch width changes during orthodontic treatment with fixed self-ligating and traditional straight-wire appliances.

Simona Tecco1, Stefano Tetè, Letizia Perillo, Claudio Chimenti, Felice Festa.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the transverse dimensions of the maxillary arch induced by fixed self-ligating and traditional straight-wire appliances during orthodontic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients (age range 14 to 30 years) with normal or low mandibular plane angle, normal overbite, and mild crowding were included. The traditional appliance was composed of Victory Series MBT brackets (3M Unitek), and the self-ligating appliance of Damon-3MX brackets (Ormco). The leveling and aligning phase with round archwires lasted 6 months and was followed by another 6 months of rectangular archwires. The archwire sequence with the MBT appliance was 0.016-inch and 0.019 3 0.025-inch Ni-Ti form II (3M Unitek), while in the Damon-3MX, it was 0.014-inch and 0.016-inch followed by 0.016 3 0.025-inch copper nickel-titanium (Ormco). Intercanine, first and second interpremolar, and intermolar widths in the maxilla were recorded before treatment (T0) and 12 months later (T1).
RESULTS: In both groups, a significant increase from T0 to T1 was recorded for all transverse measurements, but no significant difference was observed between groups.
CONCLUSION: Within 12 months of treatment, both appliances increased maxillary dentoalveolar widths.
© 2009 BY QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO, INC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20072744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthod        ISSN: 1530-5678


  7 in total

1.  Three-dimensional digital cast analysis of the effects produced by a passive self-ligating system.

Authors:  Megan B Lineberger; Lorenzo Franchi; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Luis T Huanca Ghislanzoni; James A McNamara
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.

Authors:  Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Cristina Futagami; Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti; Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro; Ricardo de Lima Navarro
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 May-Jun

3.  Long-term stability of dentoalveolar, skeletal, and soft tissue changes after non-extraction treatment with a self-ligating system.

Authors:  Faruk Ayhan Basciftci; Mehmet Akin; Zehra Ileri; Sinem Bayram
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  An assessment of conventional and self-ligating brackets in Class I maxillary constriction patients.

Authors:  Ezgi Atik; Semra Ciğer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  "In Vitro" Study About Variables that Influence in Arch Friction with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets.

Authors:  Javier Moyano; Laia Mases; Telmo Izeta; Teresa Flores; Javier Fernández-Bozal; Javier Gil; Andreu Puigdollers
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Stability of transverse dental arch dimension with passive self-ligating brackets: a 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Franz Josef Willeit; Francesca Cremonini; Paul Willeit; Fabio Ramina; Marta Cappelletti; Giorgio Alfredo Spedicato; Luca Lombardo
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.247

7.  Predictors of long-term stability of maxillary dental arch dimensions in patients treated with a transpalatal arch followed by fixed appliances.

Authors:  Gaetana Raucci; Maryam Elyasi; Camila Pachêco-Pereira; Vincenzo Grassia; Fabrizia d'Apuzzo; Carlos Flores-Mir; Letizia Perillo
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.750

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.