O Kawano1, T Ueta, K Shiba, Y Iwamoto. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japan LHWO Spinal Injuries Center, Iizuka, Fukuoka, Japan. orthosic@orange.ocn.ne.jp
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter prospective study comparing the neurological outcome of patients treated by surgical intervention versus conservative treatment for cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without bone and disc injury. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the neurological outcome of decompression surgery for CSCI without bone and disc injury in patients with spinal cord compression with incomplete paralysis (AIS B, C). SETTING: The Japan LHWO Spinal Injuries Center and the other 10 labor accident hospitals in Japan. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with AIS B, C and cervical spinal cord compression were classified into either a surgical treatment group or a conservative treatment group. The 34 patients enrolled were equally divided between the groups. Patients with AIS B, C and mild spinal compression were enrolled into another group. RESULTS: The neurological outcome of surgical treatment and conservative treatment for AIS B, C with spinal cord compression was found to be closely similar. In addition, the neurological outcome was also similar to that observed after conservative treatment for AIS B, C in patients presenting with mild spinal cord compression. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment was not found to be superior to conservative treatment for CSCI patients without bone and disc injury suffering from spinal cord compression in the acute phase.
STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter prospective study comparing the neurological outcome of patients treated by surgical intervention versus conservative treatment for cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without bone and disc injury. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the neurological outcome of decompression surgery for CSCI without bone and disc injury in patients with spinal cord compression with incomplete paralysis (AIS B, C). SETTING: The Japan LHWO Spinal Injuries Center and the other 10 labor accident hospitals in Japan. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with AIS B, C and cervical spinal cord compression were classified into either a surgical treatment group or a conservative treatment group. The 34 patients enrolled were equally divided between the groups. Patients with AIS B, C and mild spinal compression were enrolled into another group. RESULTS: The neurological outcome of surgical treatment and conservative treatment for AIS B, C with spinal cord compression was found to be closely similar. In addition, the neurological outcome was also similar to that observed after conservative treatment for AIS B, C in patients presenting with mild spinal cord compression. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment was not found to be superior to conservative treatment for CSCI patients without bone and disc injury suffering from spinal cord compression in the acute phase.
Authors: T Takao; K Kubota; T Maeda; S Okada; Y Morishita; E Mori; I Yugue; O Kawano; H Sakai; T Ueta; K Shiba Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 2.772