Literature DB >> 27995938

A radiographic evaluation of facet sagittal angle in cervical spinal cord injury without major fracture or dislocation.

T Takao1, K Kubota2, T Maeda1, S Okada2, Y Morishita1, E Mori1, I Yugue1, O Kawano1, H Sakai1, T Ueta1, K Shiba1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective radiographic study with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationships between the cervical articular facets' morphology and the incidence of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without major fracture or dislocation.
SETTING: Spinal Injuries Center, Japan.
METHODS: This study included 113 patients with traumatic CSCI without major fracture or dislocation. Eighty-four healthy volunteers without neurological deficits or cervical cord pathology on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were defined as control subjects. We used a plain sagittal radiograph to measure the facet sagittal angles (FSA) at four cervical segments in all the CSCI patients and controls. We defined the FSA as the angle between the inferior margin of the superior cervical spinal body and the inferior articular process of the superior vertebra.
RESULTS: Most frequent incidence of CSCI was seen at C3-4 segment (54%). With respect to CSCI at C3-4 segment, 55.7% of the subjects showed smallest FSA at C3-4 segment.
CONCLUSION: Most of the traumatic CSCI at C3-4 segment showed raised cervical articular facets at C3-4 segment. On the basis of our results, we hypothesized that the raised cervical articular facets might have an important role in the etiology of traumatic CSCI. The cervical spinal cord at the C3-4 segment might receive the highest load during acute hyperextension of the cervical spine because of the C3-4 articular facets' morphology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27995938     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2016.172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  9 in total

1.  Cervical spinal canal stenosis: the differences between stenosis at the lower cervical and multiple segment levels.

Authors:  Yuichiro Morishita; Masatoshi Naito; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Acute cervical cord injury without fracture or dislocation of the spinal column.

Authors:  I Koyanagi; Y Iwasaki; K Hida; M Akino; H Imamura; H Abe
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Clinical relationship between cervical spinal canal stenosis and traumatic cervical spinal cord injury without major fracture or dislocation.

Authors:  Tsuneaki Takao; Yuichiro Morishita; Seiji Okada; Takeshi Maeda; Fumihiko Katoh; Takayoshi Ueta; Eiji Mori; Itaru Yugue; Osamu Kawano; Keiichiro Shiba
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Etiologic factors of myelopathy. A radiographic evaluation of the aging changes in the cervical spine.

Authors:  H Hayashi; K Okada; M Hamada; K Tada; R Ueno
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Does ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament affect the neurological outcome after traumatic cervical cord injury?

Authors:  Seiji Okada; Takeshi Maeda; Yasuyuki Ohkawa; Katsumi Harimaya; Hirokazu Saiwai; Hiromi Kumamaru; Yoshihiro Matsumoto; Toshio Doi; Takayoshi Ueta; Keiichiro Shiba; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Sequential MRI studies in patients with cervical cord injury but without bony injury.

Authors:  K Shimada; T Tokioka
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1995-10

7.  Use of the finite element method to study the mechanism of spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Yasuaki Imajo; Isamu Hiiragi; Yoshihiko Kato; Toshihiko Taguchi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Outcome of decompression surgery for cervical spinal cord injury without bone and disc injury in patients with spinal cord compression: a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  O Kawano; T Ueta; K Shiba; Y Iwamoto
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Clinical Influence of Cervical Spinal Canal Stenosis on Neurological Outcome after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury without Major Fracture or Dislocation.

Authors:  Tsuneaki Takao; Seiji Okada; Yuichiro Morishita; Takeshi Maeda; Kensuke Kubota; Ryosuke Ideta; Eiji Mori; Itaru Yugue; Osamu Kawano; Hiroaki Sakai; Takayoshi Ueta; Keiichiro Shiba
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-06-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.