Literature DB >> 26078230

Subacute T1-low intensity area reflects neurological prognosis for patients with cervical spinal cord injury without major bone injury.

A Matsushita1, T Maeda1, E Mori1, I Yugue1, O Kawano1, T Ueta1, K Shiba1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective imaging and clinical study.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features and neurological prognosis in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without major bone injury.
METHODS: A total of 72 patients with CSCI without major bone injury were treated conservatively in our hospital. MRI was performed for all patients at admission and 1 month following injury. We measured the antero-posterior and cranio-caudal diameter of intramedullary intensity changed area with T1-weighted images at the injured segment. Neurological evaluations were performed using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score and the modified Frankel grade at the time of admission and discharge.
RESULTS: There was a significant relationship between the antero-posterior diameter ratio of the T1-weighted low-intensity area on MRI at the subacute stage and the ASIA motor score. The optimal threshold of the T1-weighted low-intensity diameter ratio for predicting the patient's ability to walk with or without assistance at discharge was determined to be 46%. Moreover, 96.8% of the patients with <50% T1-weighted low-intensity area recovered to walk with or without a cane at discharge.
CONCLUSION: The T1-low intensity area may be an important predictive factor for the neurological recovery of CSCI without major bone injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26078230     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2015.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  18 in total

1.  Cervical spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality in adults.

Authors:  H S Bhatoe
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Can magnetic resonance imaging reflect the prognosis in patients of cervical spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality?

Authors:  Masaaki Machino; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Hiroaki Nakashima; Shunsuke Kanbara; Daigo Morita; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Acute cervical cord injury without fracture or dislocation of the spinal column.

Authors:  I Koyanagi; Y Iwasaki; K Hida; M Akino; H Imamura; H Abe
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Correlation between histopathologic features and magnetic resonance images of spinal cord lesions.

Authors:  I Ohshio; A Hatayama; K Kaneda; M Takahara; K Nagashima
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Histopathologic correlation of magnetic resonance imaging signal patterns in a spinal cord injury model.

Authors:  S D Weirich; H B Cotler; P A Narayana; J D Hazle; E F Jackson; K J Coupe; C L McDonald; L A Langford; J H Harris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome--prospective study with 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Firoz Miyanji; Julio C Furlan; Bizhan Aarabi; Paul M Arnold; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Predictors of neurologic recovery in acute central cervical cord injury with only upper extremity impairment.

Authors:  Yoichiro Ishida; Toshikatsu Tominaga
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The potential for functional recovery of upper extremity function following cervical spinal cord injury without major bone injury.

Authors:  T Hayashi; O Kawano; H Sakai; R Ideta; T Ueta; T Maeda; E Mori; I Yugue; T Takao; M Masuda; Y Morishita; K Shiba
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Does ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament affect the neurological outcome after traumatic cervical cord injury?

Authors:  Seiji Okada; Takeshi Maeda; Yasuyuki Ohkawa; Katsumi Harimaya; Hirokazu Saiwai; Hiromi Kumamaru; Yoshihiro Matsumoto; Toshio Doi; Takayoshi Ueta; Keiichiro Shiba; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The adult spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormalities syndrome: magnetic resonance imaging and clinical findings in adults with spinal cord injuries having normal radiographs and computed tomography studies.

Authors:  Georgios B Kasimatis; Elias Panagiotopoulos; Panagiotis Megas; Charalambos Matzaroglou; John Gliatis; Minos Tyllianakis; Elias Lambiris
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  Predictive factors for irreversible motor paralysis following cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Tsunehiko Konomi; Kota Suda; Masahiro Ozaki; Satoko Matsumoto Harmon; Miki Komatsu; Seiji Iimoto; Osahiko Tsuji; Akio Minami; Masahiko Takahata; Norimasa Iwasaki; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Traumatic cervical spine injury: Short-and medium-term prognostic factors in 102 patients.

Authors:  Hilal Abboud; Idris Ziani; Adyl Melhaoui; Yasser Arkha; Abdessamad Elouahabi
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-02-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.