Literature DB >> 20065673

The view from the trenches: part 1-emergency medical response plans and the need for EPR screening.

Robert M Gougelet1, Michael E Rea, Roberto J Nicolalde, James A Geiling, Harold M Swartz.   

Abstract

Few natural disasters or intentional acts of war or terrorism have the potential for such severe impact upon a population and infrastructure as the intentional detonation of a nuclear device within a major U.S. city. In stark contrast to other disasters or even a "dirty bomb," hundreds of thousands will be affected and potentially exposed to a clinically significant dose of ionizing radiation. This will result in immediate deaths and injuries and subsequently the development of Acute Radiation Syndrome (ARS). Additionally, millions more who are unlikely to develop ARS will seek medical evaluation and treatment, overwhelming the capacity of an already compromised medical system. In this paper, the authors propose that in vivo electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) dosimetry be utilized to screen large numbers of potentially exposed victims, and that this screening process be incorporated into the medical-surge framework that is currently being implemented across the nation for other catastrophic public health emergencies. The National Incident Management System (NIMS), the National Response Framework (NRF), the Target Capabilities List (TCL), Homeland Security Presidential Directives (HSPD), as well as additional guidance from multiple federal agencies provide a solid framework for this response. The effective screening of potentially-exposed victims directly following a nuclear attack could decrease the number of patients seeking immediate medical care by greater than 90%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20065673      PMCID: PMC3982875          DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181a6de7d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  15 in total

1.  A note on the number of survey stations required in a mass casualty radiation event.

Authors:  Ronald E Goans
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 2.  Disasters and mass casualties: I. General principles of response and management.

Authors:  Christopher T Born; Susan M Briggs; David L Ciraulo; Eric R Frykberg; Jeffrey S Hammond; Asher Hirshberg; David W Lhowe; Patricia A O'Neill
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Prediction modeling to determine the adequacy of medical response to urban nuclear attack.

Authors:  Cham E Dallas; William C Bell
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.385

4.  The Tokyo subway sarin attack: disaster management, Part 2: Hospital response.

Authors:  T Okumura; K Suzuki; A Fukuda; A Kohama; N Takasu; S Ishimatsu; S Hinohara
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  The Tokyo subway sarin attack: disaster management, Part 1: Community emergency response.

Authors:  T Okumura; K Suzuki; A Fukuda; A Kohama; N Takasu; S Ishimatsu; S Hinohara
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Immediate medical consequences of nuclear accidents. Lessons from Chernobyl.

Authors:  R P Gale
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-08-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Radiologic and nuclear events: contingency planning for hematologists/oncologists.

Authors:  David M Weinstock; Cullen Case; Judith L Bader; Nelson J Chao; C Norman Coleman; Richard J Hatchett; Daniel J Weisdorf; Dennis L Confer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Medical management of the acute radiation syndrome: recommendations of the Strategic National Stockpile Radiation Working Group.

Authors:  Jamie K Waselenko; Thomas J MacVittie; William F Blakely; Nicki Pesik; Albert L Wiley; William E Dickerson; Horace Tsu; Dennis L Confer; C Norman Coleman; Thomas Seed; Patrick Lowry; James O Armitage; Nicholas Dainiak
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Radiation dose prediction using data on time to emesis in the case of nuclear terrorism.

Authors:  Eugene Demidenko; Benjamin B Williams; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  An ounce of prevention is a ton of work: mass antibiotic prophylaxis for anthrax, New York City, 2001.

Authors:  Susan Blank; Linda C Moskin; Jane R Zucker
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of future incidents and investigational lines.

Authors:  Miguel J Martín; José Zapatero; Mario López
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-07-16

2.  A Framework for Comparative Evaluation of Dosimetric Methods to Triage a Large Population Following a Radiological Event.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Roberto J Nicolalde; Eugene Demidenko; Benjamin B Williams; Alla Shapiro; Albert L Wiley; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  FLEXIBLE, WIRELESS, INDUCTIVELY COUPLED SURFACE COIL RESONATOR FOR EPR TOOTH DOSIMETRY.

Authors:  Wilson Schreiber; Sergey V Petryakov; Maciej M Kmiec; Matthew A Feldman; Paul M Meaney; Victoria A Wood; Holly K Boyle; Ann Barry Flood; Benjamin B Williams; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Metabolomic changes in gastrointestinal tissues after whole body radiation in a murine model.

Authors:  Sanchita P Ghosh; Rajbir Singh; Kushal Chakraborty; Shilpa Kulkarni; Arushi Uppal; Yue Luo; Prabhjit Kaur; Rupak Pathak; K Sree Kumar; Martin Hauer-Jensen; Amrita K Cheema
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2013-02-13

Review 5.  Overview of the principles and practice of biodosimetry.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz; Benjamin B Williams; Ann Barry Flood
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  The view from the trenches: part 2-technical considerations for EPR screening.

Authors:  Roberto J Nicolalde; Robert M Gougelet; Michael Rea; Benjamin B Williams; Ruhong Dong; Maciej M Kmiec; Piotr N Lesniewski; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  A critical assessment of biodosimetry methods for large-scale incidents.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz; Ann Barry Flood; Robert M Gougelet; Michael E Rea; Roberto J Nicolalde; Benjamin B Williams
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Development of in vivo tooth EPR for individual radiation dose estimation and screening.

Authors:  Benjamin B Williams; Ruhong Dong; Maciej Kmiec; Greg Burke; Eugene Demidenko; David Gladstone; Roberto J Nicolalde; Artur Sucheta; Piotr Lesniewski; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry for a large-scale radiation incident.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz; Ann Barry Flood; Benjamin B Williams; Ruhong Dong; Steven G Swarts; Xiaoming He; Oleg Grinberg; Jason Sidabras; Eugene Demidenko; Jiang Gui; David J Gladstone; Lesley A Jarvis; Maciej M Kmiec; Kyo Kobayashi; Piotr N Lesniewski; Stephen D P Marsh; Thomas P Matthews; Roberto J Nicolalde; Patrick M Pennington; Timothy Raynolds; Ildar Salikhov; Dean E Wilcox; Bassem I Zaki
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Plasma miRNA as biomarkers for assessment of total-body radiation exposure dosimetry.

Authors:  Wanchang Cui; Jinfang Ma; Yulei Wang; Shyam Biswal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.