Literature DB >> 18388634

Prediction modeling to determine the adequacy of medical response to urban nuclear attack.

Cham E Dallas1, William C Bell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Government reports have persistently indicated the intent of terrorists and hostile nations to acquire and "weaponize" nuclear materials for deliberate attack on a major US metropolitan city.
METHODS: A modeling analysis of the effects of 20- and 550-kiloton nuclear detonations on the 2 major metropolitan centers of Los Angeles and Houston is presented with a focus on thermal casualties. Brode's work as modified by Binninger was used to calculate thermal fluence, using thermal fractions. The EM-1 and WE programs were used to calculate blast effects. Fallout radiation was calculated using the Defense Threat Reduction Agency's Hazard Prediction and Assessment Capability V404SP4 with "urban effects" turned on. The ESRI ArcView program calculated affected populations from 2000 US Census block-level data for areas affected by thermal effects.
RESULTS: The population affected by a 550-kiloton nuclear weapon detonated in Los Angeles and Houston is staggering: surviving thermal casualties are estimated at 185,000 and 59,000, respectively. Even the 20-kiloton detonations in Los Angeles and Houston are significant: the numbers of surviving thermal casualties requiring care exceed 28,000 and 10,000, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The surviving health care community postdetonation would be faced with an unprecedented burden of care for thermal casualties. A great expansion of personnel involved in emergency burn care response is critical. Bold, new approaches such as regionalization and predetermined medical air transport need to be considered.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18388634     DOI: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e318159a9e3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep        ISSN: 1935-7893            Impact factor:   1.385


  4 in total

1.  The view from the trenches: part 1-emergency medical response plans and the need for EPR screening.

Authors:  Robert M Gougelet; Michael E Rea; Roberto J Nicolalde; James A Geiling; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 2.  Justification for a Nuclear Global Health Workforce: multidisciplinary analysis of risk, survivability & preparedness, with emphasis on the triage management of thermal burns.

Authors:  Frederick M Burkle; Tom Potokar; James E Gosney; Cham Dallas
Journal:  Confl Health       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.723

Review 3.  Disaster Preparedness and Response for the Burn Mass Casualty Incident in the Twenty-first Century.

Authors:  Randy D Kearns; David E Marcozzi; Noran Barry; Lewis Rubinson; Charles Scott Hultman; Preston B Rich
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 2.017

4.  Nuclear war between Israel and Iran: lethality beyond the pale.

Authors:  Cham E Dallas; William C Bell; David J Stewart; Antonio Caruso; Frederick M Burkle
Journal:  Confl Health       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.723

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.