Literature DB >> 20064657

Impaired access to manipulation features in Apraxia: evidence from eyetracking and semantic judgment tasks.

Jong-yoon Myung1, Sheila E Blumstein, Eiling Yee, Julie C Sedivy, Sharon L Thompson-Schill, Laurel J Buxbaum.   

Abstract

Apraxic patients are known for deficits in producing and comprehending skilled movements. Two experiments tested their implicit and explicit knowledge about manipulable objects in order to examine whether such deficits accompany impairment in the conceptual representation of manipulation features. An eyetracking method was used to test implicit knowledge (Experiment 1): participants viewed a visual display on a computer screen and touched the corresponding object in response to an auditory input. Manipulation relationship among objects was not task-relevant, and thus the assessment of manipulation knowledge was implicit. Like the non-apraxic control patients, apraxic patients fixated on an object picture (e.g., "typewriter") that was manipulation-related to a target word (e.g., 'piano') significantly more often than an unrelated object picture (e.g., "bucket") as well as a visual control (e.g., "couch"). However, this effect emerged later than in the non-apraxic control group, suggesting impaired access to manipulation features in the apraxic group. In the semantic judgment task (Experiment 2), participants were asked to make an explicit judgment about the relationship of picture triplets of manipulable objects by choosing the pair with similar manipulation features. Apraxic patients performed significantly worse on this task than the non-apraxic control group. Both implicit and explicit measures of manipulation knowledge show that apraxia is not merely a perceptuomotor deficit of skilled movements, but results in a concomitant impairment in representing manipulation features and accessing them for cognitive processing. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20064657      PMCID: PMC2853734          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  19 in total

1.  Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems.

Authors:  Lawrence W. Barsalou; W Kyle Simmons; Aron K. Barbey; Christine D. Wilson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation.

Authors:  Marion L Kellenbach; Matthew Brett; Karalyn Patterson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Eleanor M Saffran
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: modality-specific effects of prior activation.

Authors:  Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

5.  At the root of embodied cognition: cognitive science meets neurophysiology.

Authors:  Francesca Garbarini; Mauro Adenzato
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Role of mental imagery in a property verification task: FMRI evidence for perceptual representations of conceptual knowledge.

Authors:  Irene P Kan; Lawrence W Barsalou; Karen Olseth Solomon; Jeris K Minor; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Word processing in Parkinson's disease is impaired for action verbs but not for concrete nouns.

Authors:  Véronique Boulenger; Laura Mechtouff; Stéphane Thobois; Emmanuel Broussolle; Marc Jeannerod; Tatjana A Nazir
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Semantic processing in aphasia: evidence from an auditory lexical decision task.

Authors:  S E Blumstein; W Milberg; R Shrier
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Consuelo B Boronat; Laurel J Buxbaum; H Branch Coslett; Kathy Tang; Eleanor M Saffran; Daniel Y Kimberg; John A Detre
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-07

10.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  22 in total

1.  Manipulability and object recognition: is manipulability a semantic feature?

Authors:  Fabio Campanella; Tim Shallice
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Observing functional actions affects semantic processing of tools: evidence of a motor-to-semantic priming.

Authors:  Francesco De Bellis; Antonia Ferrara; Domenico Errico; Francesco Panico; Laura Sagliano; Massimiliano Conson; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  What we talk about when we talk about access deficits.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Allison E Britt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Reply: apraxia: a gestural or a cognitive disorder?

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Allison D Shapiro; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Incidental and context-responsive activation of structure- and function-based action features during object identification.

Authors:  Chia-lin Lee; Erica Middleton; Daniel Mirman; Solène Kalénine; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Reduced competition between tool action neighbors in left hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Frank E Garcea; Harrison Stoll; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Uncovering the architecture of action semantics.

Authors:  Christine E Watson; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The role of conflict, feedback, and action comprehension in monitoring of action errors: Evidence for internal and external routes.

Authors:  Cortney M Howard; Louisa L Smith; H Branch Coslett; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Moving the gesture engram into the 21st century.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Abnormal dynamics of activation of object use information in apraxia: evidence from eyetracking.

Authors:  Chia-Iin Lee; Daniel Mirman; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.