Literature DB >> 20063297

Long-term outcome of atrial synchronous mode pacing in patients with atrioventricular block using a single lead.

Miry Blich1, Mahmoud Suleiman, Tawfiq Zeidan Shwiri, Ibrahim Marai, Monther Boulos, Shlomo Amikam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines suggest the use of atrial synchronous mode (VDD) pacemakers in patients with atrioventricular (AV) block and normal sinus node function. However VDD mode is being used much less than expected. The objectives of our study were to evaluate the efficacy of VDD pacing in long-term follow-up and to find risk factors for VDD loss.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all patients with VDD pacemakers who were implanted in our center between 1995 and 2007.
RESULTS: During the study period, 123 consecutive patients with AV block (51% men, age 62 +/- 17.8 years) received a VDD pacemaker. Mean follow up duration was 4.5 +/- 3.2 years. At the last follow up visit, 21 patients (21.6%) lost their original VDD mode and were programmed to ventricular-based pacing (VVIR) (undersensing, 11; chronic AF, 7; SND, 3). In 28 patients, VDD mode was restored or maintained by increasing atrial sensitivity. No episodes of atrial oversensing were observed. In multivariate analysis history of paroxysmal AF (p = 0.007, odds ratio 36.6, 95% confidence interval 2.7-493.7) and p wave lower than 1 mv during the follow up (p = 0.021, odds ratio 7, 95% confidence interval 1.3-36.7), were found risk factors to VDD loss.
CONCLUSIONS: VDD pacing has good long-term performance. Absence of paroxysmal AF history predicts maintenance of VDD pacing mode. Taking into account that no atrial oversensing was observed, our recommendation is to increase atrial sensitivity when P wave amplitude declines to less than 1 mv. Copyright 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20063297      PMCID: PMC6653580          DOI: 10.1002/clc.20695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  16 in total

1.  Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators.

Authors:  S J Connolly; C R Kerr; M Gent; R S Roberts; S Yusuf; A M Gillis; M H Sami; M Talajic; A S Tang; G J Klein; C Lau; D M Newman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-05-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The world survey of cardiac pacing and cardioverter defibrillators: calendar year 2001.

Authors:  Harry G Mond; Marleen Irwin; Carlos Morillo; Hugo Ector
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Retrospective analysis of mode survival, reliability of atrial sensing and incidence of atrial tachyarrhythmias in 307 single-lead VDD pacemaker patients.

Authors:  Igor Zupan; Luka Lipar; David Zizek; Wim Boute; Masa Vidmar; Tone Gabrijelcic; Peter Rakovec; Ales Brecelj
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Atrial sensing and AV synchrony in single lead VDD pacemakers: a prospective comparison to DDD devices with bipolar atrial leads.

Authors:  U K Wiegand; F Bode; R Schneider; G Taubert; A Brandes; W Peters; H A Katus; J Potratz
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-04

5.  Implantation strategy of the atrial dipole impacts atrial sensing performance of single lead VDD pacemakers.

Authors:  Uwe K H Wiegand; Bernd Nowak; Udo Reisp; Torsten Peiffer; Frank Bode; Jürgen Potratz
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Immediate and long-term atrial sensing stability in single-lead VDD pacing depends on right atrial dimensions.

Authors:  M Santini; R Ricci; C Pignalberi; A Auriti; M Pepe; R Assale; D Caporicci
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Intrapatient comparison between chronic VVIR and DDD pacing in patients affected by high degree AV block without heart failure.

Authors:  C Menozzi; M Brignole; P V Moracchini; G Lolli; M Bacchi; M C Tesorieri; G D Tosoni; R Bollini
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Value of VDD-pacing systems in patients with atrioventricular block: experience over a decade.

Authors:  Beat Andreas Schaer; Markus Weinbacher; Michael Johannes Zellweger; Christian Sticherling; Stefan Osswald
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Cost-effectiveness of dual-chamber pacemaker therapy: does single lead VDD pacing reduce treatment costs of atrioventricular block?

Authors:  U K Wiegand; J Potratz; F Bode; R Schreiber; H Bonnemeier; W Peters; H A Katus
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Optimal pacing for symptomatic AV block: a comparison of VDD and DDD pacing.

Authors:  Max Huang; Andrew D Krahn; Raymond Yee; George J Klein; Allan C Skanes
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.