Literature DB >> 20060724

The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its implication for knee arthroplasty.

S Lustig1, C Fleury, D Goy, P Neyret, S T Donell.   

Abstract

The majority of the current computer-assisted systems (CAS) for knee prosthetic surgery require the acquisition of points using a tracker detected by an infrared camera. Two types of measurements are then essential: angles and distances. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the data obtained during computer-assisted surgery using an in vitro protocol. Two models were developed to locate precisely both points (120 acquisitions) and distance measurements (144 acquisitions) and angles (170 acquisitions) with an image-free CAS using an infrared optical camera. For validation, a precise coordinate 3D measurement device was used to assess the accuracy of CAS acquisitions. The points, distances and angles had a mean error respectively of 0.638 mm (0.244 mm to 0.931 mm), 0.355 mm (0.001 mm to 1.338 mm) and 0.39° (0.06° to 0.69°). For all these acquisitions, the mean error was statistically less than 1mm or 1° (p<0.001). By using a 3D measurement system, it was possible to determine the accuracy of the data obtained with the navigation system. The precision assessed at less than 1mm or 1° corresponds with the accuracy needed in knee arthroplasty and with the use of CAS as a measurement tool. Variability in computer-assisted navigation may be more likely related to other aspects of the procedure such as bony landmark acquisition, tolerance of saw blades and cutting jigs than the accuracy of the imageless CAS itself.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20060724     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  11 in total

1.  Assessing the accuracy of patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jong-Keun Seon; Hyeong-Won Park; Seung-Hyun Yoo; Eun-Kyoo Song
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty, where are we today?

Authors:  Sébastien Lustig; Robert A Magnussen; Diane L Dahm; David Parker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [Soft tissue balanced navigation of total knee arthroplasties].

Authors:  C Schnurr; I Stolzenberg; J Nessler; P Eysel; P König
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  The limits of precision in conventionally instrumented computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R E da Assunção; N J Hancock; W J M Bruce; P Walker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  How much tibial resection is required in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Christoph Schnurr; György Csécsei; Jochen Nessler; Peer Eysel; Dietmar Pierre König
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Case-related factors affecting cutting errors of the proximal tibia in total knee arthroplasty assessed by computer navigation.

Authors:  Tadashi Tsukeoka; Yoshikazu Tsuneizumi; Kensuke Yoshino; Mashiko Suzuki
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Abnormal rate of intraoperative and postoperative implant positioning outliers using "MRI-based patient-specific" compared to "computer assisted" instrumentation in total knee replacement.

Authors:  M Ollivier; Q Tribot-Laspiere; J Amzallag; P Boisrenoult; N Pujol; P Beaufils
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Sagittal placement of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty predicts knee flexion contracture at one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Sebastien Lustig; Corey J Scholes; Tim J Stegeman; Sam Oussedik; Myles R J Coolican; David A Parker
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty does not match the pre-operative plan as assessed by intra-operative computer-assisted navigation.

Authors:  Corey Scholes; Varun Sahni; Sebastien Lustig; David A Parker; Myles R J Coolican
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Factors influencing posterior tibial slope and tibial rotation in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Matthias Jacobi; Vincent Villa; Nikolaus Reischl; Guillaume Demey; Damien Goy; Philippe Neyret; Emanuel Gautier; Robert A Magnussen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.