Literature DB >> 22730387

Electroporation induced by internal defibrillation shock with and without recovery in intact rabbit hearts.

Yves T Wang1, Igor R Efimov, Yuanna Cheng.   

Abstract

Defibrillation shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators can be lifesaving but can also damage cardiac tissues via electroporation. This study characterizes the spatial distribution and extent of defibrillation shock-induced electroporation with and without a 45-min postshock period for cell membranes to recover. Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 31) with and without a chronic left ventricular (LV) myocardial infarction (MI) were studied. Mean defibrillation threshold (DFT) was determined to be 161.4 ± 17.1 V and 1.65 ± 0.44 J in MI hearts for internally delivered 8-ms monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) shocks during sustained ventricular fibrillation (>20 s, SVF). A single 300-V MTE shock (twice determined DFT voltage) was used to terminate SVF. Shock-induced electroporation was assessed by propidium iodide (PI) uptake. Ventricular PI staining was quantified by fluorescent imaging. Histological analysis was performed using Masson's Trichrome staining. Results showed PI staining concentrated near the shock electrode in all hearts. Without recovery, PI staining was similar between normal and MI groups around the shock electrode and over the whole ventricles. However, MI hearts had greater total PI uptake in anterior (P < 0.01) and posterior (P < 0.01) LV epicardial regions. Postrecovery, PI staining was reduced substantially, but residual staining remained significant with similar spacial distributions. PI staining under SVF was similar to previously studied paced hearts. In conclusion, electroporation was spatially correlated with the active region of the shock electrode. Additional electroporation occurred in the LV epicardium of MI hearts, in the infarct border zone. Recovery of membrane integrity postelectroporation is likely a prolonged process. Short periods of SVF did not affect electroporation injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22730387      PMCID: PMC3423145          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01121.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  48 in total

1.  Nonuniform responses of transmembrane potential during electric field stimulation of single cardiac cells.

Authors:  D K Cheng; L Tung; E A Sobie
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1999-07

2.  Effects of electroporation on the transmembrane potential distribution in a two-dimensional bidomain model of cardiac tissue.

Authors:  F Aguel; K A Debruin; W Krassowska; N A Trayanova
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-05

3.  Computer simulations of successful defibrillation in decoupled and non-uniform cardiac tissue.

Authors:  N H L Kuijpers; R H Keldermann; T Arts; P A J Hilbers
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Cell and tissue responses to electric shocks.

Authors:  Takashi Ashihara; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 5.  Membrane electroporation theories: a review.

Authors:  C Chen; S W Smye; M P Robinson; J A Evans
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Modelling cardiac fibroblasts: interactions with myocytes and their impact on impulse propagation.

Authors:  Vincent Jacquemet; Craig S Henriquez
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Electrical impedance properties of normal and chronically infarcted left ventricular myocardium.

Authors:  D Schwartzman; I Chang; J J Michele; M S Mirotznik; K R Foster
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Causes and consequences of heart failure after prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial II.

Authors:  Ilan Goldenberg; Arthur J Moss; W Jackson Hall; Scott McNitt; Wojciech Zareba; Mark L Andrews; David S Cannom
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Mechanisms of enhanced shock-induced arrhythmogenesis in the rabbit heart with healed myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Li Li; Vladimir Nikolski; Don W Wallick; Igor R Efimov; Yuanna Cheng
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 10.  Electroporation of the heart.

Authors:  Vladimir P Nikolski; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.214

View more
  15 in total

1.  Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Elena Gianulis; P Thomas Vernier; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-01-10

2.  Excitation of murine cardiac myocytes by nanosecond pulsed electric field.

Authors:  Jan E Azarov; Iurii Semenov; Maura Casciola; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-01-17

3.  Phase Entrainment of Induced Ventricular Fibrillation: A Human Feasibility and Proof of Concept Study.

Authors:  Arun V Holden; Gordon A Begg; Katrina Bounford; Berthold Stegemann; Muzahir H Tayebjee
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2019-12-31

4.  Diffuse, non-polar electropermeabilization and reduced propidium uptake distinguish the effect of nanosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Christian Zemlin; Olga N Pakhomova; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-06-22

5.  Optical pacing of the adult rabbit heart.

Authors:  Michael W Jenkins; Y T Wang; Y Q Doughman; M Watanabe; Y Cheng; A M Rollins
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Low-energy defibrillation with nanosecond electric shocks.

Authors:  Frency Varghese; Johanna U Neuber; Fei Xie; Jonathan M Philpott; Andrei G Pakhomov; Christian W Zemlin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 10.787

7.  Electrical storm: mechanistic and therapeutic considerations to avoid death in the survivors.

Authors:  Yukiomi Tsuji; Dobromir Dobrev
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.005

8.  Prognostic impact of electrical storm in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Mechanistic and therapeutic considerations to reduce the risk of death.

Authors:  Yukiomi Tsuji; Dobromir Dobrev
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.039

Review 9.  The Defibrillation Conundrum: New Insights into the Mechanisms of Shock-Related Myocardial Injury Sustained from a Life-Saving Therapy.

Authors:  Nicolas Clementy; Alexandre Bodin; Arnaud Bisson; Ana-Paula Teixeira-Gomes; Sebastien Roger; Denis Angoulvant; Valérie Labas; Dominique Babuty
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Ablation of Myocardial Tissue With Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields.

Authors:  Fei Xie; Frency Varghese; Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Jonathan Philpott; Christian Zemlin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.