Literature DB >> 20058074

Mercury in South Carolina fishes, USA.

James B Glover1, Marisa E Domino, Kenneth C Altman, James W Dillman, William S Castleberry, Jeannie P Eidson, Micheal Mattocks.   

Abstract

The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control has collected, processed, and analyzed fish tissue total mercury (Hg) since 1976. For this study, skin-on-filet data from 1993 to 2007 were examined to determine biotic, spatial and temporal trends in tissue Hg levels for SC fishes. Because of the relatively high number of tissue Hg values below the analytical detection limits interval censored regression and censored least absolute deviations were used to construct several models to characterize trends. Large pelagic, piscivorous fish species, such as bowfin (Amia calva Linnaeus 1766), had higher levels of tissue Hg than smaller omnivorous species. Estuarine species had relatively low levels of tissue Hg compared to freshwater species, while two large open ocean species, king mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla Cuvier 1829) and swordfish (Xiphias gladius Linnaeus 1758), had higher tissue Hg readings. For a given fish species, length was an important predictor of tissue Hg with larger individuals having higher levels than smaller individuals. The USEPA Level III ecoregion and water body type from where the fishes were collected were important in predicting the levels of tissue Hg. The Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain ecoregion had fishes with the highest levels of tissue Hg, while the Piedmont and Southern Coastal Plain ecoregions had the lowest. For a given ecoregion, large reservoirs and regulated rivers had fish with lower levels of tissue Hg than unregulated rivers. For reservoirs, the size of the impoundment was a significant predictor of tissue mercury with small reservoirs having higher levels of tissue mercury than large reservoirs. Landuse and water chemistry accounted for differences seen in fish of various ecoregions and waterbody types. Sampling locations associated with a high percentage of wetland area had fish with high levels of tissue Hg. Correlation analysis showed a strong positive relationship between tissue Hg levels and water column iron, total organic carbon, ammonia, and total kjedahl nitrogen, and a negative relationship with alkalinity, dissolved oxygen and pH. Results from principle component analysis revealed patterns between waterbody type and water chemistry variables that suggests hydrologic modification can have profound effects on the levels of fish tissue Hg in riverine systems. From 1993 to 2007, fish tissue Hg levels have trended lower. A spike in tissue Hg levels was observed in 2003-2005. The drying and rewetting of the landscape after the 2002 drought is hypothesized to have caused an increase in the methylation efficiencies of the system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20058074     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-009-0455-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  20 in total

1.  Sources and variations of mercury in tuna.

Authors:  Anne M L Kraepiel; Klaus Keller; Henry B Chin; Elizabeth G Malcolm; François M M Morel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Physical controls on total and methylmercury concentrations in streams and lakes of the northeastern USA.

Authors:  James B Shanley; Neil C Kamman; Thomas A Clair; Ann Chalmers
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  Recovery of mercury-contaminated fisheries.

Authors:  John Munthe; R A Drew Bodaly; Brian A Branfireun; Charles T Driscoll; Cynthia C Gilmour; Reed Harris; Milena Horvat; Marc Lucotte; Olaf Malm
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Methylmercury in freshwater fish linked to atmospheric mercury deposition.

Authors:  Chad R Hammerschmid; William F Fitzgerald
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Wetland influences on mercury transport and bioaccumulation in South Carolina.

Authors:  Jane L Guentzel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Mercury in freshwater fish of northeast North America--a geographic perspective based on fish tissue monitoring databases.

Authors:  Neil C Kamman; Neil M Burgess; Charles T Driscoll; Howard A Simonin; Wing Goodale; Janice Linehan; Robert Estabrook; Michael Hutcheson; Andrew Major; Anton M Scheuhammer; David A Scruton
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Extreme spatial variability and unprecedented methylmercury concentrations within a constructed wetland.

Authors:  D G Rumbold; L E Fink
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Assessment of mercury in waters, sediments, and biota of New Hampshire and Vermont Lakes, USA, sampled using a geographically randomized design.

Authors:  Neil C Kamman; Peter M Lorey; Charles T Driscoll; Robert Estabrook; Andrew Major; Bernie Pientka; Ed Glassford
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.742

9.  Methylmercury in marine ecosystems: spatial patterns and processes of production, bioaccumulation, and biomagnification.

Authors:  Celia Chen; Aria Amirbahman; Nicholas Fisher; Gareth Harding; Carl Lamborg; Diane Nacci; David Taylor
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.184

10.  The rise and fall of mercury methylation in an experimental reservoir.

Authors:  Vincent L St Louis; John W M Rudd; Carol A Kelly; R A Drew Bodaly; Michael J Paterson; Kenneth G Beaty; Raymond H Hesslein; Andrew Heyes; Andrew R Majewski
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  7 in total

1.  How Misapplication of the Hydrologic Unit Framework Diminishes the Meaning of Watersheds.

Authors:  James M Omernik; Glenn E Griffith; Robert M Hughes; James B Glover; Marc H Weber
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Reducing methylmercury accumulation in the food webs of San Francisco Bay and its local watersheds.

Authors:  J A Davis; R E Looker; D Yee; M Marvin-Di Pasquale; J L Grenier; C M Austin; L J McKee; B K Greenfield; R Brodberg; J D Blum
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Spatial patterns of mercury in macroinvertebrates and fishes from streams of two contrasting forested landscapes in the eastern United States.

Authors:  Karen Riva-Murray; Lia C Chasar; Paul M Bradley; Douglas A Burns; Mark E Brigham; Martyn J Smith; Thomas A Abrahamsen
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Shallow groundwater mercury supply in a Coastal Plain stream.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Celeste A Journey; Mark A Lowery; Mark E Brigham; Douglas A Burns; Daniel T Button; Francis H Chapelle; Michelle A Lutz; Mark C Marvin-Dipasquale; Karen Riva-Murray
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Mercury in fish and adverse reproductive outcomes: results from South Carolina.

Authors:  James B Burch; Sara Wagner Robb; Robin Puett; Bo Cai; Rebecca Wilkerson; Wilfried Karmaus; John Vena; Erik Svendsen
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.918

6.  The influence of fish length on tissue mercury dynamics: implications for natural resource management and human health risk.

Authors:  Dana K Sackett; W Gregory Cope; James A Rice; D Derek Aday
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Influence of dietary carbon on mercury bioaccumulation in streams of the Adirondack Mountains of New York and the Coastal Plain of South Carolina, USA.

Authors:  Karen Riva-Murray; Paul M Bradley; Lia C Chasar; Daniel T Button; Mark E Brigham; Barbara C Scudder Eikenberry; Celeste A Journey; Michelle A Lutz
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.823

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.