Literature DB >> 16404537

Extreme spatial variability and unprecedented methylmercury concentrations within a constructed wetland.

D G Rumbold1, L E Fink.   

Abstract

We began monitoring concentrations of both total mercury (THg) and methylmercury (MeHg) in surface water at Stormwater Treatment Area-2 (STA) on July 20, 2000. This 2602 hectare STA was constructed with three independent marshes to remove phosphorus from agricultural runoff and reduce eutrophication in the northern Everglades. However, there was concern that in doing so, STA-2 might inadvertently worsen the existing mercury problem in the Everglades. Accordingly, operating permits stipulated that flow-through operation of these treatment cells could not begin until concentrations of THg and MeHg in the interior marsh were not significantly greater than corresponding concentrations in the supply canal. Cells 2 and 3 quickly met the start-up criteria in the fall of 2000. In contrast, Cell 1 exhibited anomalously high MeHg concentrations in the fall of 2000 and 2001, and the summer of 2002. During the last such event, water-column concentrations in Cell 1 reached 32 ng THg/L and an unprecedented 20 ng MeHg/L. Tissue Hg in resident fishes reached levels as high as 430 ng/g in mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki, 930 ng/g in sunfish, Lepomis spp., and 2000 ng/g in largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides. Guided by results from the monitoring program, flow rate and water depth were managed as a means to alter sulfur biogeochemistry and, thereby, reduce in situ mercury methylation. This adaptive management strategy likely played a role in the decline in water-column concentrations of THg and MeHg in Cell 1 by late 2002 and the subsequent declines in tissue Hg levels in resident fishes. Cell 1 finally met formal start-up criteria on November 26, 2002.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16404537     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-0767-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  5 in total

1.  Uptake of mercury by fish in an experimental boreal reservoir.

Authors:  R A Bodaly; R J Fudge
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Source of mercury in fish in new impoundments.

Authors:  J A Cox; J Carnahan; J DiNunzio; J McCoy; J Meister
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Mercury accumulation by largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) in recently impounded reservoirs.

Authors:  A R Abernathy; P M Cumbie
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  Monitoring and mass budget for mercury in the everglades nutrient removal project

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Effect of point source removal on mercury bioaccumulation in an industrial pond.

Authors:  George R Southworth; Mark J Peterson; Mary A Bogle
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.086

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Projecting changes in Everglades soil biogeochemistry for carbon and other key elements, to possible 2060 climate and hydrologic scenarios.

Authors:  William Orem; Susan Newman; Todd Z Osborne; K Ramesh Reddy
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Mercury in South Carolina fishes, USA.

Authors:  James B Glover; Marisa E Domino; Kenneth C Altman; James W Dillman; William S Castleberry; Jeannie P Eidson; Micheal Mattocks
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Ecological risk of methylmercury in Everglades National Park, Florida, USA.

Authors:  D G Rumbold; T R Lange; D M Axelrad; T D Atkeson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Effect of Elodea nuttallii roots on bacterial communities and MMHg proportion in a Hg polluted sediment.

Authors:  Nicole Regier; Beat Frey; Brandon Converse; Eric Roden; Alexander Grosse-Honebrink; Andrea Garcia Bravo; Claudia Cosio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Fish mercury and surface water sulfate relationships in the Everglades Protection Area.

Authors:  Mark C Gabriel; Nicole Howard; Todd Z Osborne
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Challenges and opportunities for managing aquatic mercury pollution in altered landscapes.

Authors:  Heileen Hsu-Kim; Chris S Eckley; Dario Achá; Xinbin Feng; Cynthia C Gilmour; Sofi Jonsson; Carl P J Mitchell
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.