Literature DB >> 15046335

The rise and fall of mercury methylation in an experimental reservoir.

Vincent L St Louis1, John W M Rudd, Carol A Kelly, R A Drew Bodaly, Michael J Paterson, Kenneth G Beaty, Raymond H Hesslein, Andrew Heyes, Andrew R Majewski.   

Abstract

For the past 9 years, we experimentally flooded a wetland complex (peatland surrounding an open water pond) at the Experimental Lakes Area (ELA), northwestern Ontario, Canada, to examine the biogeochemical cycling of methyl mercury (MeHg) in reservoirs. Using input-output budgets, we found that prior to flooding, the wetland complex was a net source of approximately 1.7 mg MeHg ha(-1) yr(-1) to downstream ecosystems. In the first year of flooding, net yields of MeHg from the reservoir increased 40-fold to approximately 70 mg MeHg ha(-1) yr(-1). Subsequently, annual net yields of MeHg from the reservoir declined (10-50 mg MeHg ha(-1) yr(-1)) but have remained well above natural levels. The magnitude and timing of Hg methylation in the flooded peat portion of the wetland reservoir were very different than in the open water region of the reservoir. In terms of magnitude, net Hg methylation rates in the peat in the first 2 years of flooding were 2700 mg ha(-1) yr(-1), constituting over 97% of the MeHg produced at the whole-ecosystem level. But in the following 3 years, there was a large decrease in the mass of MeHg in the flooded peat due to microbial demethylation. In contrast, concentrations of MeHg in the open water region and in zooplankton, and body burdens of Hg in cyprinid fish, remained high for the full 9 years of this study. Microbial activity in the open water region also remained high, as evidenced by continued high concentrations of dissolved CO2 and CH4. Thus, the large short-term accumulation of MeHg mass in the peat appeared to have only a small influence on concentrations of MeHg in the biota; rather MeHg accumulation in biota was sustained by the comparatively small ongoing net methylation of Hg in the flooded pond where microbial activity remained high. In large reservoirs, where the effects of wind and fetch are greater than in the small experimental reservoir we constructed, differences can occur in the timing and extent of peat and soil erosion, effecting either transport of MeHg to the food chain or the fueling of microbial activity in open water sediments, both of which could have important long-term implications for MeHg concentrations in predatory fish.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15046335     DOI: 10.1021/es034424f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  13 in total

1.  Physical controls on total and methylmercury concentrations in streams and lakes of the northeastern USA.

Authors:  James B Shanley; Neil C Kamman; Thomas A Clair; Ann Chalmers
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Assessment of mercury bioaccumulation within the pelagic food web of lakes in the western Great Lakes region.

Authors:  Kristofer R Rolfhus; Britt D Hall; Bruce A Monson; Michael J Paterson; Jeffrey D Jeremiason
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Hepatic mercury, cadmium, and lead in mink and otter from New York State: monitoring environmental contamination.

Authors:  David T Mayack
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Key contributors to variations in fish mercury within and among freshwater reservoirs in Oklahoma, USA.

Authors:  Zhao Dong; Robert A Lynch; Laurel A Schaider
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.238

5.  Freshwater discharges drive high levels of methylmercury in Arctic marine biota.

Authors:  Amina T Schartup; Prentiss H Balcom; Anne L Soerensen; Kathleen J Gosnell; Ryan S D Calder; Robert P Mason; Elsie M Sunderland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Spatial gradients of methylmercury for breeding common loons in the Laurentian Great Lakes region.

Authors:  David C Evers; Kathryn A Williams; Michael W Meyer; Anton M Scheuhammer; Nina Schoch; Andrew T Gilbert; Lori Siegel; Robert J Taylor; Robert Poppenga; Christopher R Perkins
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Using nestling feathers to assess spatial and temporal concentrations of mercury in bald eagles at Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota, USA.

Authors:  H T Pittman; W W Bowerman; L H Grim; T G Grubb; W C Bridges
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Assessing element-specific patterns of bioaccumulation across New England lakes.

Authors:  Darren M Ward; Brandon Mayes; Stefan Sturup; Carol L Folt; Celia Y Chen
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Mercury in South Carolina fishes, USA.

Authors:  James B Glover; Marisa E Domino; Kenneth C Altman; James W Dillman; William S Castleberry; Jeannie P Eidson; Micheal Mattocks
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  The influence of sulphate deposition on the seasonal variation of peat pore water methyl Hg in a boreal mire.

Authors:  Inger Bergman; Kevin Bishop; Qiang Tu; Wolfgang Frech; Staffan Åkerblom; Mats Nilsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.