Literature DB >> 20056458

Does preoperative symptom classification impact prognosis in patients with clinically localized upper-tract urothelial carcinoma managed by radical nephroureterectomy?

Jay D Raman1, Shahrokh F Shariat, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Yair Lotan, Arthur I Sagalowsky, Marco Roscigno, Francesco Montorsi, Christian Bolenz, Alon Z Weizer, Jeffery C Wheat, Casey K Ng, Douglas S Scherr, Mesut Remzi, Matthias Waldert, Christopher G Wood, Vitaly Margulis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if preoperative symptom classification could refine prediction of outcomes for patients with clinically localized upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) managed by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).
METHODS: Data on 654 patients with localized UTUC who underwent RNU were reviewed. Preoperative symptoms were classified as incidental (S1), local (S2), and systemic (S3). Clinical and pathologic data were compared between the cohorts. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to determine recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival amongst the symptom cohorts.
RESULTS: Symptom classification was S1 in 213 (33%) patients, S2 in 402 (61%), and S3 in 39 (6%). S3 symptoms were associated with advanced pathology, including higher stage, grade, and lymph node (LN) positivity. Five and 10-year recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival estimates were similar for patients with S1 and S2 symptoms (P = 0.75 and 0.58, respectively), but was worse for patients with S3 symptoms (P < 0.001 for both). On multivariate analysis adjusting for final pathologic stage, grade, and LN status, S3 symptoms were not an independent predictor of recurrence (HR 1.44, P = 0.19) or death due to disease (HR 1.66, P = 0.07). Addition of symptom classification, however, increased the accuracy of a model consisting of stage, grade, and LNs for prediction of recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival by 1.4% and 1.3%, respectively (P < 0.001 for both).
CONCLUSIONS: Local symptoms do not confer worse prognosis compared with patients with incidentally detected UTUC. However, systemic symptoms are associated with worse outcomes despite apparently effective RNU. Patients with systemic symptoms may harbor micrometastatic disease and could potentially benefit from a more rigorous metastatic evaluation or perioperative chemotherapy regimens.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20056458     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  21 in total

1.  [Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: clinical and pathological criteria and their predictive implications after radical nephroureterectomy].

Authors:  Christian Seitz; Paul Schramek
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-08

Review 2.  [Upper tract urothelial carcinoma. An update on clinical and pathological prognostic factors].

Authors:  M Rink; M Adam; J Hansen; F K Chun; S A Ahyai; M Remzi; T Schlomm; O Engel; R Heuer; C Eichelberg; M Fisch; R Dahlem; S F Shariat
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Prognostic factors and predictive tools for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aurélie Mbeutcha; Morgan Rouprêt; Ashish M Kamat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Giacomo Novara; Jay D Raman; Christian Seitz; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas F Chromecki; Karim Bensalah; Mesut Remzi; Grégory Verhoest; Eugene K Cha; Douglas S Scherr; Giacomo Novara; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Paradigm shift towards nephron sparing management.

Authors:  Julia V Fiuk; Brad F Schwartz
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-06

Review 6.  Predictive factors of recurrence and survival of upper tract urothelial carcinomas.

Authors:  Grégory Verhoest; Shahrokh F Shariat; Thomas F Chromecki; Jay D Raman; Vitaly Margulis; Giacomo Novara; Christian Seitz; Mesut Remzi; Morgan Rouprêt; Douglas S Scherr; Karim Bensalah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Multiple carcinosarcomas of the kidney: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Hakan Ozturk
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-05

Review 8.  Cost-effectiveness of Common Diagnostic Approaches for Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria.

Authors:  Joshua A Halpern; Bilal Chughtai; Hassan Ghomrawi
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Influence of preoperative factors on the oncologic outcome for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Sophie Hurel; Morgan Rouprêt; Thomas Seisen; Eva Comperat; Véronique Phé; Stéphane Droupy; François Audenet; Géraldine Pignot; Xavier Cathelineau; Laurent Guy; Olivier Cussenot; Adil Ouzzane; Gregory Bozzini; Laurent Nison; Alain Ruffion; Pierre Colin
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Epidemiology, diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and prognostic assessment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

Authors:  Francesco Soria; Shahrokh F Shariat; Seth P Lerner; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Michael Rink; Wassim Kassouf; Philippe E Spiess; Yair Lotan; Dingwei Ye; Mario I Fernández; Eiji Kikuchi; Daher C Chade; Marko Babjuk; Arthur P Grollman; George N Thalmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.