Literature DB >> 20054713

Assessing the left atrial phasic volume and function with dual-source CT: comparison with 3T MRI.

Zhaoying Wen1, Zhaoqi Zhang, Wei Yu, Zhanming Fan, Jing Du, Biao Lv.   

Abstract

We wanted to assess the performance of dual-source CT (DSCT) for evaluating the left atrial volume and function and we compared this performance to that of the standard reference technique,cardiac cine MR (CMR). Fifty-one patients who were referred for CT coronary angiography were included in the study. Two were subsequently excluded for having un-analyzable MR images at the onset of left atrial contraction. For the remaining 49 patients, the DSCT data sets and FIESTA (fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition) cines of the vertical long axis covering the left atrium and the short axis covering the left ventricle were obtained on the same day. All the images were analyzed to obtain the maximal left atrial volume (LAVmax), the minimal left atrial volume (LAVmin), the left atrial volume just before left atrium contraction (LAVp), the left atrial reservoir volume (LARV), the left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF), the left atrial passive emptying volume (LAPV), the left atrial active emptying volume(LAAV), the left atrial conduit volume (LACV), the left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), the left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) and the left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV) by using 3D semi-segmentation software and Report Card 2.0 software, respectively, for the DSCT and CMR. All the parameters were normalized to the body surface area. Intermodality agreement was tested through linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses.Repeated measurements were performed to determine the interobserver variability. The DSCT measurements resulted in good correlation (r > 0.75) compared with those of CMR. However, DSCT slightly,but insignificantly overestimated the indexed LAVmax, LAVmin, LAVp, LARV, LAPV, LAAV and LACV, as reflected by biases of 1.2, 0.9, 1.1, 0.3, 0.1,0.2 and 0.4 ml/m(2), respectively. The LAEF was minimally, but insignificantly underestimated as reflected by a bias of -0.6% (P = ns). The variability of the DSCT measurements was lower than that of the CMR values. DSCT provides highly reliable and reproducible measurements of the left atrial phasic volume and function in patients who are referred for coronary CT imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20054713     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-009-9569-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  28 in total

Review 1.  Quantification of global left ventricular function: comparison of multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. a meta-analysis and review of the current literature.

Authors:  P A van der Vleuten; T P Willems; M J W Götte; R A Tio; M J W Greuter; F Zijlstra; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Dual-source CT with improved temporal resolution in assessment of left ventricular function: a pilot study.

Authors:  Harald Brodoefel; Ulrich Kramer; Anja Reimann; Christof Burgstahler; Stephen Schroeder; Andreas Kopp; Martin Heuschmid
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing.

Authors:  Sebastian Leschka; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Andre Plass; Oliver Gaemperli; Ines Valenta; Lars Husmann; Thomas G Flohr; Michele Genoni; Borut Marincek; Philipp A Kaufmann; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Left ventricular function can reliably be assessed from dual-source CT using ECG-gated tube current modulation.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Philipp Bruners; Bernhard Schmidt; Christoph Bornikoel; Thomas Flohr; Rolf W Günther
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Two-dimensional echocardiographic methods for assessment of left atrial volume.

Authors:  Keiji Ujino; Marion E Barnes; Stephen S Cha; Andrew P Langins; Kent R Bailey; James B Seward; Teresa S M Tsang
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Right and left atrial phasic volumetric function in mildly symptomatic dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: cine MR imaging assessment.

Authors:  V M Järvinen; M M Kupari; V P Poutanen; P E Hekali
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Atrial enlargement as a consequence of atrial fibrillation. A prospective echocardiographic study.

Authors:  A J Sanfilippo; V M Abascal; M Sheehan; L B Oertel; P Harrigan; R A Hughes; A E Weyman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Long-term prognostic significance of left atrial volume in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Roy Beinart; Valentina Boyko; Ehud Schwammenthal; Rafael Kuperstein; Alex Sagie; Hanoch Hod; Shlomo Matetzky; Solomon Behar; Michael Eldar; Micha S Feinberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  A new method for measurement of left atrial volumes using 64-slice spiral computed tomography: comparison with two-dimensional echocardiographic techniques.

Authors:  Luc Christiaens; Benoît Lequeux; Paul Ardilouze; Stephanie Ragot; Jean Mergy; Daniel Herpin; Benjamin Bonnet; Joseph Allal
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Determinants and prognostic value of left atrial volume in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Andrea Rossi; Mariantonietta Cicoira; Luisa Zanolla; Rita Sandrini; Giorgio Golia; Piero Zardini; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  7 in total

1.  Assessment of left atrial volume and function: a comparative study between echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging and multi slice computed tomography.

Authors:  J Tobias Kühl; Jacob Lønborg; Andreas Fuchs; Mads J Andersen; Niels Vejlstrup; Henning Kelbæk; Thomas Engstrøm; Jacob E Møller; Klaus F Kofoed
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Predictive value of left atrial volume measured by non-invasive cardiac imaging in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Christian von Bary; Christian Dornia; Christoph Eissnert; Sotirios Nedios; Mattias Roser; Okka W Hamer; Jin-Hong Gerds-Li; Ingo Paetsch; Cosima Jahnke; Rolf Gebker; Stefan Weber; Eckart Fleck; Charalampos Kriatselis
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction Assessment with Dual-Source CT.

Authors:  Zhaoying Wen; Heng Ma; Ying Zhao; Zhanming Fan; Zhaoqi Zhang; Sang Il Choi; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Jiayi Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Association of common variations on chromosome 4q25 and left atrial volume in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Yuliya Mints; Hirad Yarmohammadi; Irfan M Khurram; Hana Hoyt; Rozann Hansford; Stefan L Zimmerman; Steven J Steinberg; Daniel P Judge; Gordon F Tomaselli; Hugh Calkins; Vadim Zipunnikov; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-13

5.  Incremental role of CT coronary angiography in the assessment of left ventricular diastolic function.

Authors:  Aleksandra Lange; Harry Huntress; Jesse Steindl; Przemyslaw Palka
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-03

Review 6.  The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cardiac Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Left Atrial Anatomy, Size, and Function.

Authors:  Petr Kuchynka; Jana Podzimkova; Martin Masek; Lukas Lambert; Vladimir Cerny; Barbara Danek; Tomas Palecek
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Relationship of phasic left atrial volume and emptying function to left ventricular filling pressure: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  Kanna Posina; Jeannette McLaughlin; Peter Rhee; Laura Li; Joshua Cheng; William Schapiro; Ronald J Gulotta; Andrew D Berke; George A Petrossian; Nathaniel Reichek; Jie J Cao
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 5.364

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.