Literature DB >> 10631158

Laws restricting health insurers' use of genetic information: impact on genetic discrimination.

M A Hall1, S S Rich.   

Abstract

Since 1991, 28 states have enacted laws that prohibit insurers' use of genetic information in pricing, issuing, or structuring health insurance. This article evaluates whether these laws reduce the extent of genetic discrimination by health insurers. From the data collected at multiple sites, we find that there are almost no well-documented cases of health insurers either asking for or using presymptomatic genetic test results in their underwriting decisions, either (a) before or after these laws have been enacted or (b) in states with or without these laws. By using both in-person interviews with insurers and a direct market test, we found that a person with a serious genetic condition who is presymptomatic faces little or no difficulty in obtaining health insurance. Furthermore, there are few indications that the degree of difficulty varies according to whether a state regulates the use of genetic information. Nevertheless, these laws have made it less likely that insurers will use genetic information in the future. Although insurers and agents are only vaguely aware of these laws, the laws have shaped industry norms and attitudes about the legitimacy of using this information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10631158      PMCID: PMC1288333          DOI: 10.1086/302714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  25 in total

1.  Genetic testing and health insurance practices: an industry perspective.

Authors:  L C Volpe
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  1998

2.  Protecting genetic difference.

Authors:  Michael S Yesley
Journal:  Berkeley Technol Law J       Date:  1998

3.  Recent legislation on genetics and insurance.

Authors:  Helen R Davis; Janice V Mitrius
Journal:  Jurimetrics       Date:  1996

4.  Future directions in genetic counseling: practical and ethical considerations.

Authors:  Barbara Bowles Biesecker
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1998-06

5.  Distinguishing genetic from nongenetic medical tests: some implications for antidiscrimination legislation.

Authors:  Joseph S Alper; Jon Beckwith
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Individual, family, and societal dimensions of genetic discrimination: a case study analysis.

Authors:  Lisa N Geller; Joseph S Alper; Paul R Billings; Carol I Barash; Jonathan Beckwith; Marvin R Natowicz
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Insurers' use of genetic information.

Authors:  Mark A Hall
Journal:  Jurimetrics       Date:  1996

8.  What is adverse about adverse selection?

Authors:  M V Pauly
Journal:  Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res       Date:  1985

9.  Genetic counseling: the development of a new interdisciplinary occupational field.

Authors:  R H Kenen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 10.  The efficacy of law as a paternalistic instrument.

Authors:  R J Bonnie
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  1985
View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Genetic testing and insurance.

Authors:  A Murthy; A Dixon; E Mossialos
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Is GINA worth the wait?

Authors:  Mark A Rothstein
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Consumer awareness and attitudes about insurance discrimination post enactment of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.

Authors:  Dawn C Allain; Sue Friedman; Leigha Senter
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 4.  Ethical considerations in genomic testing for hematologic disorders.

Authors:  Jonathan M Marron; Steven Joffe
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Re-identification of DNA through an automated linkage process.

Authors:  B Malin; L Sweeney
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

6.  Reconceptualizing harms and benefits in the genomic age.

Authors:  Anya E R Prince; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Ethical Challenges in Pediatric Oncology Care and Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Daniel J Benedetti; Jonathan M Marron
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2021

8.  Evolving perspectives on genetic discrimination in health insurance among health care providers.

Authors:  Carin R Huizenga; Katrina Lowstuter; Kimberly C Banks; Veronica I Lagos; Virginia O Vandergon; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Views of discrimination among individuals confronting genetic disease.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Perception, experience, and response to genetic discrimination in Huntington's disease: the Australian results of The International RESPOND-HD study.

Authors:  Anita M Y Goh; Edmond Chiu; Olga Yastrubetskaya; Cheryl Erwin; Janet K Williams; Andrew R Juhl; Jane S Paulsen
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2013-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.