Literature DB >> 18468943

Linking form and motion in the primate brain.

Zoe Kourtzi1, Bart Krekelberg, Richard J A van Wezel.   

Abstract

Understanding dynamic events entails the integration of information about form and motion that is crucial for fast and successful interactions in complex environments. A striking example of our sensitivity to dynamic information is our ability to recognize animate figures by the way they move and infer motion from still images. Accumulating evidence for form and motion interactions contrasts with the traditional dissociation between shape and motion-related processes in the ventral and dorsal visual pathways. By combining findings from physiology and brain imaging it can be demonstrated that the primate brain converts information about spatiotemporal sequences into meaningful actions through interactions between early and higher visual areas processing form and motion and frontal-parietal circuits involved in the understanding of actions.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18468943     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  32 in total

1.  Contributions of magno- and parvocellular channels to conscious and non-conscious vision.

Authors:  Bruno G Breitmeyer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Hands in motion: an upper-limb-selective area in the occipitotemporal cortex shows sensitivity to viewed hand kinematics.

Authors:  Tanya Orlov; Yuval Porat; Tamar R Makin; Ehud Zohary
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Ventral aspect of the visual form pathway is not critical for the perception of biological motion.

Authors:  Sharon Gilaie-Dotan; Ayse Pinar Saygin; Lauren J Lorenzi; Geraint Rees; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Attentional capture for tool images is driven by the head end of the tool, not the handle.

Authors:  Rafal M Skiba; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Time dilation caused by static images with implied motion.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamamoto; Kayo Miura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Emotional and movement-related body postures modulate visual processing.

Authors:  Khatereh Borhani; Elisabetta Làdavas; Martin E Maier; Alessio Avenanti; Caterina Bertini
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Efficiency of extracting stereo-driven object motions.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Averaging facial expression over time.

Authors:  Jason Haberman; Tom Harp; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Neural correlates of apparent motion perception of impoverished facial stimuli: a comparison of ERP and ERSP activity.

Authors:  Alejandra Rossi; Francisco J Parada; Artemy Kolchinsky; Aina Puce
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Pre-exposure to moving form enhances static form sensitivity.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Mark A Williams; Derek H Arnold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.