Literature DB >> 20051232

Dissociation of the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity strength and item repetition.

Sarah S Yu1, Michael D Rugg.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were employed to investigate the relationship between the familiarity strength of recognition memory test items (pictures of animate and inanimate objects) and a putative ERP correlate of familiarity, the mid-frontal 'old/new' effect. A modified Remember/Know task was used in which subjects endorsed items as 'remembered' if any detail of the study presentation could be retrieved and, if not, judged the old/new status of the item using a 4-point confidence scale ('confident old' to 'confident new'). Studied test items elicited a mid-frontal old/new effect that varied according to the rated familiarity of the eliciting item. Thus, prior findings that the mid-frontal effect is graded according to familiarity strength are not attributable to the confounding influence of study status, as has been suggested. ERPs elicited by studied and unstudied items that were rated equally familiar differed in the same latency range as that occupied by the mid-frontal old/new effect. Furthermore, the scalp topography of this repetition effect differed significantly from the topography of the mid-frontal effect. The findings suggest that ERPs elicited by recognition memory test items are modulated during the 300-500 ms latency range both by the familiarity strength of the item and, separately, by an implicit memory process that acts independently of the processes supporting familiarity-driven recognition judgments. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20051232      PMCID: PMC2826612          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  36 in total

1.  Remember-know: a matter of confidence.

Authors:  John C Dunn
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming.

Authors:  R N Henson; A Rylands; E Ross; P Vuilleumeir; M D Rugg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Vincent Stretch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

4.  Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Leun J Otten; Kendra N Shaw; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Fluent conceptual processing and explicit memory for faces are electrophysiologically distinct.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Ken A Paller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing.

Authors:  W Donaldson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

8.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory.

Authors:  M D Rugg; R E Mark; P Walla; A M Schloerscheidt; C S Birch; K Allan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Guideline thirteen: guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. American Electroencephalographic Society.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.177

10.  The hippocampus supports both the recollection and the familiarity components of recognition memory.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; John T Wixted; Ramona O Hopkins; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  34 in total

1.  Recollection and familiarity make independent contributions to memory judgments.

Authors:  Lisa H Evans; Edward L Wilding
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Late Positive Component Event-related Potential Amplitude Predicts Long-term Classroom-based Learning.

Authors:  Katherine W Turk; Ala'a A Elshaar; Rebecca G Deason; Nadine C Heyworth; Corrine Nagle; Bruno Frustace; Sean Flannery; Ann Zumwalt; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  A critical role of the human hippocampus in an electrophysiological measure of implicit memory.

Authors:  Richard James Addante
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  How does testing affect retrieval-related processes? An event-related potential (ERP) study on the short-term effects of repeated retrieval.

Authors:  Timm Rosburg; Mikael Johansson; Michael Weigl; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  ERP abnormalities elicited by word repetition in fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) and amnestic MCI.

Authors:  Jin-Chen Yang; Lillian Chi; Sara Teichholtz; Andrea Schneider; Rawi Nanakul; Ralph Nowacki; Andreea Seritan; Bruce Reed; Charles DeCarli; Vicente J Iragui; Marta Kutas; Paul J Hagerman; Randi J Hagerman; John M Olichney
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  Sleep and the processing of emotions.

Authors:  Gaétane Deliens; Médhi Gilson; Philippe Peigneux
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Memory availability and referential access.

Authors:  Clinton L Johns; Peter C Gordon; Debra L Long; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014-01-01

8.  ENHANCING IMPLICIT LEARNING WITH POSTHYPNOTIC SUGGESTION: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Jerome Daltrozzo; Gerardo E Valdez
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

9.  Age differences in the neural correlates of the specificity of recollection: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Erin D Horne; Joshua D Koen; Nedra Hauck; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Manipulating letter fluency for words alters electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory.

Authors:  Heather D Lucas; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.