Literature DB >> 16446148

The hippocampus supports both the recollection and the familiarity components of recognition memory.

Peter E Wais1, John T Wixted, Ramona O Hopkins, Larry R Squire.   

Abstract

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) has been used to investigate the component processes of recognition memory. Some studies with this technique have been taken to indicate that the hippocampus selectively supports the process of recollection, whereas adjacent cortex in the parahippocampal gyrus supports the process of familiarity. We analyzed ROC data from young adults, memory-impaired patients with limited hippocampal lesions, and age-matched controls. The shape of the ROC changed in similar ways from asymmetric to symmetric, as a function of the strength of memory (strong to weak) in both the young adults and the patients. Moreover, once overall memory strength was similar, the shape of the patient ROC was asymmetric and matched the control ROC. These results suggest that the component processes that determine the shape of the ROC are operative in the absence of the hippocampus, and they argue against the idea that the hippocampus selectively supports the recollection process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16446148      PMCID: PMC1457095          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  28 in total

1.  The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: comment on Yonelinas (1999).

Authors:  J Qin; C L Raye; M K Johnson; K J Mitchell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Vincent Stretch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

Review 4.  On Common Ground: Jost's (1897) law of forgetting and Ribot's (1881) law of retrograde amnesia.

Authors:  John T Wixted
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory.

Authors:  Scott D Slotnick; Chad S Dodson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-01

6.  Preserved visual recognition memory in an amnesic patient with hippocampal lesions.

Authors:  Emmanuel J Barbeau; Olivier Felician; Sven Joubert; Anna Sontheimer; Mathieu Ceccaldi; Michel Poncet
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

8.  Frontal lobe damage produces episodic memory impairment.

Authors:  M A Wheeler; D T Stuss; E Tulving
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  Dissociation between recall and recognition memory performance in an amnesic patient with hippocampal damage following carbon monoxide poisoning.

Authors:  Christine Bastin; Martial Linden; Annik Charnallet; Christine Denby; Daniela Montaldi; Neil Roberts; Mayes Andrew
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.881

10.  Quantifying medial temporal lobe damage in memory-impaired patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Gold; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.899

View more
  73 in total

1.  Cognitive training-related changes in hippocampal activity associated with recollection in older adults.

Authors:  Brenda A Kirchhoff; Benjamin A Anderson; Staci E Smith; Deanna M Barch; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Generalization through the recurrent interaction of episodic memories: a model of the hippocampal system.

Authors:  Dharshan Kumaran; James L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The fate of old memories after medial temporal lobe damage.

Authors:  Peter J Bayley; Ramona O Hopkins; Larry R Squire
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Item memory, source memory, and the medial temporal lobe: concordant findings from fMRI and memory-impaired patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Gold; Christine N Smith; Peter J Bayley; Yael Shrager; James B Brewer; Craig E L Stark; Ramona O Hopkins; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Recognition memory: opposite effects of hippocampal damage on recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Magdalena M Sauvage; Norbert J Fortin; Cullen B Owens; Andrew P Yonelinas; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-25       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Impaired familiarity with preserved recollection after anterior temporal-lobe resection that spares the hippocampus.

Authors:  Ben Bowles; Carina Crupi; Seyed M Mirsattari; Susan E Pigott; Andrew G Parrent; Jens C Pruessner; Andrew P Yonelinas; Stefan Köhler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; John T Wixted; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Experience-dependent eye movements, awareness, and hippocampus-dependent memory.

Authors:  Christine N Smith; Ramona O Hopkins; Larry R Squire
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  From network heterogeneities to familiarity detection and hippocampal memory management.

Authors:  Jane X Wang; Gina Poe; Michal Zochowski
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2008-10-03

10.  Dissociation of the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity strength and item repetition.

Authors:  Sarah S Yu; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.