PURPOSE: Telomerase activity is one of the hallmarks of cancer and is a highly relevant therapeutic target. The effects of a novel human telomerase antagonist, imetelstat, on primary human glioblastoma (GBM) tumor-initiating cells were investigated in vitro and in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tumor-initiating cells were isolated from primary GBM tumors and expanded as neurospheres in vitro. The GBM tumor-initiating cells were treated with imetelstat and examined for the effects on telomerase activity levels, telomere length, proliferation, clonogenicity, and differentiation. Subsequently, mouse orthotopic and subcutaneous xenografts were used to assess the in vivo efficacy of imetelstat. RESULTS: Imetelstat treatment produced a dose-dependent inhibition of telomerase (IC(50) 0.45 micromol/L). Long-term imetelstat treatment led to progressive telomere shortening, reduced rates of proliferation, and eventually cell death in GBM tumor-initiating cells. Imetelstat in combination with radiation and temozolomide had a dramatic effect on cell survival and activated the DNA damage response pathway. Imetelstat is able to cross the blood-brain barrier in orthotopic GBM xenograft tumors. Fluorescently labeled GBM tumor cells isolated from orthotopic tumors, following systemic administration of imetelstat (30 mg/kg every day for three days), showed approximately 70% inhibition of telomerase activity. Chronic systemic treatment produced a marked decrease in the rate of xenograft subcutaneous tumor growth. CONCLUSION: This preclinical study supports the feasibility of testing imetelstat in the treatment of GBM patients, alone or in combination with standard therapies.
PURPOSE: Telomerase activity is one of the hallmarks of cancer and is a highly relevant therapeutic target. The effects of a novel human telomerase antagonist, imetelstat, on primary humanglioblastoma (GBM) tumor-initiating cells were investigated in vitro and in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Tumor-initiating cells were isolated from primary GBM tumors and expanded as neurospheres in vitro. The GBM tumor-initiating cells were treated with imetelstat and examined for the effects on telomerase activity levels, telomere length, proliferation, clonogenicity, and differentiation. Subsequently, mouse orthotopic and subcutaneous xenografts were used to assess the in vivo efficacy of imetelstat. RESULTS:Imetelstat treatment produced a dose-dependent inhibition of telomerase (IC(50) 0.45 micromol/L). Long-term imetelstat treatment led to progressive telomere shortening, reduced rates of proliferation, and eventually cell death in GBM tumor-initiating cells. Imetelstat in combination with radiation and temozolomide had a dramatic effect on cell survival and activated the DNA damage response pathway. Imetelstat is able to cross the blood-brain barrier in orthotopic GBM xenograft tumors. Fluorescently labeled GBM tumor cells isolated from orthotopic tumors, following systemic administration of imetelstat (30 mg/kg every day for three days), showed approximately 70% inhibition of telomerase activity. Chronic systemic treatment produced a marked decrease in the rate of xenograft subcutaneous tumor growth. CONCLUSION: This preclinical study supports the feasibility of testing imetelstat in the treatment of GBM patients, alone or in combination with standard therapies.
Authors: Rossella Galli; Elena Binda; Ugo Orfanelli; Barbara Cipelletti; Angela Gritti; Simona De Vitis; Roberta Fiocco; Chiara Foroni; Francesco Dimeco; Angelo Vescovi Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Sheila K Singh; Ian D Clarke; Mizuhiko Terasaki; Victoria E Bonn; Cynthia Hawkins; Jeremy Squire; Peter B Dirks Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ralph Salloum; Trent R Hummel; Shiva Senthil Kumar; Kathleen Dorris; Shaoyu Li; Tong Lin; Vinay M Daryani; Clinton F Stewart; Lili Miles; Tina Young Poussaint; Charles Stevenson; Stewart Goldman; Girish Dhall; Roger Packer; Paul Fisher; Ian F Pollack; Maryam Fouladi; James Boyett; Rachid Drissi Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Isaac Marin-Valencia; Steve K Cho; Dinesh Rakheja; Kimmo J Hatanpaa; Payal Kapur; Tomoyuki Mashimo; Ashish Jindal; Vamsidhara Vemireddy; Levi B Good; Jack Raisanen; Xiankai Sun; Bruce Mickey; Changho Choi; Masaya Takahashi; Osamu Togao; Juan M Pascual; Ralph J Deberardinis; Elizabeth A Maher; Craig R Malloy; Robert M Bachoo Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Jian Yan; Panyupa Pankhong; Thomas H Shin; Nyamekye Obeng-Adjei; Matthew P Morrow; Jewell N Walters; Amir S Khan; Niranjan Y Sardesai; David B Weiner Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: C Lavanya; Manjunatha M Venkataswamy; M K Sibin; M M Srinivas Bharath; G K Chetan Journal: Cytotechnology Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 2.058
Authors: Sarah K Brennan; Qiuju Wang; Robert Tressler; Calvin Harley; Ning Go; Ekaterina Bassett; Carol Ann Huff; Richard J Jones; William Matsui Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 3.240