Literature DB >> 27449347

The Vascular Quality Initiative Cardiac Risk Index for prediction of myocardial infarction after vascular surgery.

Daniel J Bertges1, Dan Neal2, Andres Schanzer3, Salvatore T Scali2, Philip P Goodney4, Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen5, Jack L Cronenwett4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop and to validate the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Cardiac Risk Index (CRI) for prediction of postoperative myocardial infarction (POMI) after vascular surgery.
METHODS: We developed risk models for in-hospital POMI after 88,791 nonemergent operations from the VQI registry, including carotid endarterectomy (CEA; n = 45,340), infrainguinal bypass (INFRA; n = 18,054), suprainguinal bypass (SUPRA; n = 2678), endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR; n = 18,539), and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OAAA repair; n = 4180). Multivariable logistic regression was used to create an all-procedure and four procedure-specific risk calculators based on the derivation cohort from 2012 to 2014 (N = 61,236). Generalizability of the all-procedure model was evaluated by applying it to each procedure subtype. The models were validated using a cohort (N = 27,555) from January 2015 to February 2016. Model discrimination was measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and performance was validated by bootstrapping 5000 iterations. The VQI CRI calculator was made available on the Internet and as a free smart phone app available through QxCalculate.
RESULTS: Overall POMI incidence was 1.6%, with variation by procedure type as follows: CEA, 0.8%; EVAR, 1.0%; INFRA, 2.6%; SUPRA, 3.1%; and OAAA repair, 4.3% (P < .001). Predictors of POMI in the all-procedure model included age, operation type, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes, creatinine concentration >1.8 mg/dL, stress test status, and body mass index (AUC, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.76). The all-procedure model demonstrated only minimally reduced accuracy when it was applied to each procedure, with the following AUCs: CEA, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59-0.70); INFRA, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64-0.73); EVAR, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.65-0.80); SUPRA, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.52-0.72); and OAAA, 0.63 (95% CI, 0.56-0.70). Procedure-specific models had unique predictors and showed improved prediction compared with the all-procedure model, with the following AUCs: CEA, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.66-0.72); INFRA, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.73-0.78); EVAR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.73-0.80); and OAAA, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.77). Bias-corrected AUC (95% CI) from internal validation for the models was as follows: all procedures, 0.75 (0.73-0.76); CEA, 0.68 (0.65-0.71); INFRA, 0.74 (0.72-0.76); EVAR, 0.73 (0.70-0.78); and OAAA repair, 0.68 (0.65-0.73).
CONCLUSIONS: The VQI CRI is a useful and valid clinical decision-making tool to predict POMI after vascular surgery. Procedure-specific models improve accuracy when they include unique risk factors.
Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27449347      PMCID: PMC5079798          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  27 in total

1.  Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  T H Lee; E R Marcantonio; C M Mangione; E J Thomas; C A Polanczyk; E F Cook; D J Sugarbaker; M C Donaldson; R Poss; K K Ho; L E Ludwig; A Pedan; L Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Predicting medical and surgical complications of carotid endarterectomy: comparing the risk indexes.

Authors:  Matthew J Press; Mark R Chassin; Jason Wang; Stanley Tuhrim; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-24

3.  The universal definition of myocardial infarction: a consensus document: ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  Joseph S Alpert; Kristian Thygesen; Allan Jaffe; Harvey D White
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Variations in the utilization of endovascular aneurysm repair reflect population risk factors and disease prevalence.

Authors:  Tina T Ng; James Mirocha; David Magner; Bruce L Gewertz
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Maarten L Simoons; Bernard R Chaitman; Harvey D White; Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Harvey D White; Allan S Jaffe; Hugo A Katus; Fred S Apple; Bertil Lindahl; David A Morrow; Bernard R Chaitman; Peter M Clemmensen; Per Johanson; Hanoch Hod; Richard Underwood; Jeroen J Bax; Jeroen J Bonow; Fausto Pinto; Raymond J Gibbons; Keith A Fox; Dan Atar; L Kristin Newby; Marcello Galvani; Christian W Hamm; Barry F Uretsky; Ph Gabriel Steg; William Wijns; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Phillippe Menasche; Jan Ravkilde; E Magnus Ohman; Elliott M Antman; Lars C Wallentin; Paul W Armstrong; Maarten L Simoons; James L Januzzi; Markku S Nieminen; Mihai Gheorghiade; Gerasimos Filippatos; Russell V Luepker; Stephen P Fortmann; Wayne D Rosamond; Dan Levy; David Wood; Sidney C Smith; Dayi Hu; Jose-Luis Lopez-Sendon; Rose Marie Robertson; Douglas Weaver; Michal Tendera; Alfred A Bove; Alexander N Parkhomenko; Elena J Vasilieva; Shanti Mendis; Jeroen J Bax; Helmut Baumgartner; Claudio Ceconi; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Robert Fagard; Christian Funck-Brentano; David Hasdai; Arno Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Theresa McDonagh; Cyril Moulin; Bogdan A Popescu; Zeljko Reiner; Udo Sechtem; Per Anton Sirnes; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; Alec Vahanian; Stephan Windecker; Joao Morais; Carlos Aguiar; Wael Almahmeed; David O Arnar; Fabio Barili; Kenneth D Bloch; Ann F Bolger; Hans Erik Botker; Biykem Bozkurt; Raffaele Bugiardini; Christopher Cannon; James de Lemos; Franz R Eberli; Edgardo Escobar; Mark Hlatky; Stefan James; Karl B Kern; David J Moliterno; Christian Mueller; Aleksandar N Neskovic; Burkert Mathias Pieske; Steven P Schulman; Robert F Storey; Kathryn A Taubert; Pascal Vranckx; Daniel R Wagner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  The Vascular Study Group of New England Cardiac Risk Index (VSG-CRI) predicts cardiac complications more accurately than the Revised Cardiac Risk Index in vascular surgery patients.

Authors:  Daniel J Bertges; Philip P Goodney; Yuanyuan Zhao; Andres Schanzer; Brian W Nolan; Donald S Likosky; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Jack L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Application of clinically valid cardiac risk factors to aortic aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  R A Yeager; R M Weigel; E S Murphy; D B McConnell; T M Sasaki; R M Vetto
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1986-03

Review 8.  Systematic review: prediction of perioperative cardiac complications and mortality by the revised cardiac risk index.

Authors:  Meredith K Ford; W Scott Beattie; Duminda N Wijeysundera
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery and its association with short-term mortality.

Authors:  Judith A R van Waes; Hendrik M Nathoe; Jurgen C de Graaff; Hans Kemperman; Gert Jan de Borst; Linda M Peelen; Wilton A van Klei
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Combining clinical and thallium data optimizes preoperative assessment of cardiac risk before major vascular surgery.

Authors:  K A Eagle; C M Coley; J B Newell; D C Brewster; R C Darling; H W Strauss; T E Guiney; C A Boucher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Utility of the Vascular Quality Initiative in improving quality of care in Canadian patients undergoing vascular surgery

Authors:  Elizabeth Liao; Naomi Eisenberg; Anish Kaushal; Janice Montbriand; Kong-Teng Tan; Graham Roche-Nagle
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Association of High Mortality With Postoperative Myocardial Infarction After Major Vascular Surgery Despite Use of Evidence-Based Therapies.

Authors:  Robert J Beaulieu; Danielle C Sutzko; Jeremy Albright; Erin Jeruzal; Nicholas H Osborne; Peter K Henke
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Regional Variation in Postoperative Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Andrea M Steely; Peter W Callas; Daniel Neal; Salvatore T Scali; Philip P Goodney; Andres Schanzer; Jack L Cronenwett; Daniel J Bertges
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 1.466

4.  External Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Improve Selection of Patients for Carotid Endarterectomy.

Authors:  Michiel H F Poorthuis; Reinier A R Herings; Kirsten Dansey; Johanna A A Damen; Jacoba P Greving; Marc L Schermerhorn; Gert J de Borst
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Comparison of Electronic Frailty Metrics for Prediction of Adverse Outcomes of Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Sidney T Le; Vincent X Liu; Patricia Kipnis; Jie Zhang; Peter D Peng; Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 16.681

6.  Risk Factors Associated with Perioperative Myocardial Infarction in Major Open Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Danielle C Sutzko; Elizabeth A Andraska; Andrea T Obi; Peter K Henke; Nicholas H Osborne
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 1.466

7.  Society for Vascular Nursing endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm updated nursing clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Debra Kohlman-Trigoboff; Kathleen Rich; Anne Foley; Karen Fitzgerald; Dianne Arizmendi; Carolyn Robinson; Rebecca Brown; Diane Treat-Jacobson
Journal:  J Vasc Nurs       Date:  2020-05-21

8.  Failure on a Vascular Surgery Board-American Board of Surgery Examination does not predict cardiovascular outcomes in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.

Authors:  Larry W Kraiss; Ragheed Al-Dulaimi; Jack L Cronenwett; Philip P Goodney; Daniel G Clair; John Jeb Hallett; Robert Rhodes; Joseph L Mills; Angela P Presson; Benjamin S Brooke
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Long-Term Trends in Preoperative Cardiac Evaluation and Myocardial Infarction after Elective Vascular Procedures.

Authors:  John Axley; Zdenek Novak; Juliet Blakeslee-Carter; Graeme E McFarland; Emily L Spangler; Benjamin J Pearce; Marc A Passman; Mark A Patterson; Danielle C Sutzko; Adam W Beck
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 1.466

10.  Precision Medicine Enables More TNM-Like Staging in Patients With Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia.

Authors:  Katharine L McGinigle; Nikki L B Freeman; William A Marston; Alik Farber; Michael S Conte; Michael R Kosorok; Corey A Kalbaugh
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.