Literature DB >> 20044180

Evidence for teaching practice: the impact of clickers in a large classroom environment.

Barbara Patterson1, Judith Kilpatrick, Eric Woebkenberg.   

Abstract

As the number of nursing students increases, the ability to actively engage all students in a large classroom is challenging and increasingly difficult. Clickers, or student response systems (SRS), are a relatively new technology in nursing education that use wireless technology and enable students to select individual responses to questions posed to them during class. The study design was a quasi-experimental comparison with one section of an adult medical-surgical course using the SRS and one receiving standard teaching. No significant differences between groups on any measure of performance were found. Focus groups were conducted to describe student perceptions of SRS. Three themes emerged: Being able to respond anonymously, validating an answer while providing immediate feedback, and providing an interactive and engaging environment. Although the clickers did not improve learning outcomes as measured by objective testing, perceptions shared by students indicated an increased degree of classroom engagement. Future research needs to examine other potential outcome variables.
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20044180     DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Today        ISSN: 0260-6917            Impact factor:   3.442


  9 in total

1.  Perceptions of pharmacy students, faculty members, and administrators on the use of technology in the classroom.

Authors:  Margarita V DiVall; Mary S Hayney; Wallace Marsh; Michael W Neville; Stephen O'Barr; Erin D Sheets; Larry D Calhoun
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  A Faculty Toolkit for Formative Assessment in Pharmacy Education.

Authors:  Margarita V DiVall; Greg L Alston; Eleanora Bird; Shauna M Buring; Katherine A Kelley; Nanci L Murphy; Lauren S Schlesselman; Cindy D Stowe; Julianna E Szilagyi
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Systematic review of the implementation of audience response systems and their impact on participation and engagement in the education of healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Morkos Iskander
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2018-03-23

4.  Phone-based audience response system as an adjunct in orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Fahad Alharbi; Khulud F Alazmi; Bashar R El Momani; Lubna Al-Muzian; Mark Wertheimer; Anas Almukhtar; Mohammed Almuzian
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Using Audience Response Technology to provide formative feedback on pharmacology performance for non-medical prescribing students--a preliminary evaluation.

Authors:  Alison Mostyn; Oonagh Meade; Joanne S Lymn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Student perceptions of gamified audience response system interactions in large group lectures and via lecture capture technology.

Authors:  Robin K Pettit; Lise McCoy; Marjorie Kinney; Frederic N Schwartz
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  A comparative study: do "clickers" increase student engagement in multidisciplinary clinical microbiology teaching?

Authors:  Niall T Stevens; Hélène McDermott; Fiona Boland; Teresa Pawlikowska; Hilary Humphreys
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Active learning through flipped classroom in mechanical engineering: improving students' perception of learning and performance.

Authors:  Hyun Jin Cho; Kejie Zhao; Cho Rong Lee; Debra Runshe; Chuck Krousgrill
Journal:  Int J STEM Educ       Date:  2021-07-22

9.  Effects of Gamification on the Benefits of Student Response Systems in Learning of Human Anatomy: Three Experimental Studies.

Authors:  Juan J López-Jiménez; José L Fernández-Alemán; José A García-Berná; Laura López González; Ofelia González Sequeros; Joaquín Nicolás Ros; Juan M Carrillo de Gea; Ali Idri; Ambrosio Toval
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.