Literature DB >> 35515888

Systematic review of the implementation of audience response systems and their impact on participation and engagement in the education of healthcare professionals.

Morkos Iskander1,2.   

Abstract

Background: Audience response system provides a mechanism to engage larger groups as active participants in teaching sessions. However, they are traditionally based on 'fixed' closed loop system, which limits their functionality to a single geographical location, thus has the effect of confining their use to universities and other larger institutions, with a primary focus on education. Conversely, in the healthcare education context, the majority of formal education is undertaken through postgraduate training programmes, largely conducted in smaller cohorts in clinical settings. Objective: The purpose of this review is to evaluate audience response systems in terms of feasibility of implementation and the impact on participation within the field of education of healthcare professionals, in comparison to the non-healthcare education. Study selection: Therefore, systematic structured searches of PubMed and Medline databases for healthcare education were conducted, and Scopus, Education Resources Information Center, British Education Index, Education Abstracts, Education Administration Abstracts and PsycINFO databases for non-healthcare education databases. Findings and conclusions: Consistent and fundamental differences were found in the studies evaluating healthcare education compared with other fields, with more difficulties encountered in implementation and a less significant impact on engagement seen. Here we discuss the consequences of these findings on the use of audience response systems and beyond. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  audience response systems; classroom response systems; clickers; review

Year:  2018        PMID: 35515888      PMCID: PMC8936989          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  25 in total

1.  Developing an education and assessment framework for the Foundation Programme.

Authors:  Jonathan Beard; Alasdair Strachan; Helena Davies; Fiona Patterson; Patsy Stark; Steve Ball; Peter Taylor; Sarah Thomas
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 2.  A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education.

Authors:  Jacinta Secomb
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 3.036

3.  Impact of problem-based, active learning on graduation rates for 10 generations of Dutch medical students.

Authors:  Henk G Schmidt; Janke Cohen-Schotanus; Lidia R Arends
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Student evaluation of clickers in a combined dental and dental hygiene periodontology course.

Authors:  Keerthana M Satheesh; Catherine D Saylor-Boles; John W Rapley; Ying Liu; Cynthia C Gadbury-Amyot
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 5.  The impact of clickers in nursing education: a review of literature.

Authors:  Jennie C De Gagne
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.442

6.  Interactive audience response systems in oral and maxillofacial radiology undergraduate lectures.

Authors:  Christiano de Oliveira-Santos; Camila Tirapelli; Clarissa Teles Rodrigues; Carina Domaneschi; Solange Aparecida Caldeira Monteiro
Journal:  Eur J Dent Educ       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.355

7.  Use of elaborate feedback and an audience-response-system in dental education.

Authors:  Alexander Rahman; Silke Jacker-Guhr; Ingmar Staufenbiel; Karen Meyer; Michaela Zupanic; Merle Hahnemann; Anne-Katrin Lührs; Jörg Eberhard
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2013-08-15

8.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

9.  Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Paul M Duggan; Edward Palmer; Peter Devitt
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Student evaluation of clickers in a dental pathology course.

Authors:  Carmen Llena; Leopoldo Forner; Roger Cueva
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.