Literature DB >> 20043214

Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among a low-income, multiethnic, highly insured population: does provider's understanding of the patient's social context matter?

Maria De Jesus1,2, Elaine Puleo3, Rachel C Shelton4, Lorna H McNeill5, Karen M Emmons6,7.   

Abstract

The primary aim of this paper was to explore whether provider's understanding of patient's social context is associated with screening uptake, independent of provider's recommendation. Baseline data were collected in 2004-2005 from a cluster randomized control trial in 12 low-income housing sites. Participants included 695 low-income, multiethnic adults aged 50 years and over who were primarily insured (97%). Provider's recommendation was significantly associated with current adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Provider's understanding of patient's social context, as operationalized by how well participants felt that their provider knew (a) their responsibilities at work, home, or school; (b) their worries about health; and (c) them as a person and their values and beliefs, was also significantly associated with current adherence to screening, independent of provider's recommendation. Participants who reported that their provider knew them well on two or three items were significantly more likely to be current with CRC screening compared to those who reported their provider knew them well on only one or none of the items (odds ratio = 1.56; 95% confidence interval = 1.06, 2.29). Our findings indicate that provider's understanding of patient's social context, independent of provider's recommendation for CRC screening, contributed to adherence to CRC screening in this low-income, multiethnic population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20043214      PMCID: PMC2845831          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-009-9420-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  21 in total

1.  Measures for ascertaining use of colorectal cancer screening in behavioral, health services, and epidemiologic research.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Helen Meissner; Carrie Klabunde; Barbara K Rimer; Dennis J Ahnen; Roshan Bastani; Margaret T Mandelson; Marion R Nadel; Sherri Sheinfeld-Gorin; Jane Zapka
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Judith Swan; Nancy Breen; Ralph J Coates; Barbara K Rimer; Nancy C Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Predictors of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  G A Brenes; E D Paskett
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among the US urban Japanese population.

Authors:  Keiko Honda
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Model for incorporating social context in health behavior interventions: applications for cancer prevention for working-class, multiethnic populations.

Authors:  Glorian Sorensen; Karen Emmons; Mary Kay Hunt; Elizabeth Barbeau; Roberta Goldman; Karen Peterson; Karen Kuntz; Anne Stoddard; Lisa Berkman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening in mammography-adherent older women.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Jennifer S Ford; David Klein; Louis H Primavera; Tamara R Buckley; Traci R Stein; Moshe Shike; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-12

7.  Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Marion R Nadel; Carrie N Klabunde; Trevor Thompson; Jean A Shapiro; Sally W Vernon; Ralph J Coates
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study.

Authors:  Nancy K Janz; Patricia A Wren; David Schottenfeld; Kenneth E Guire
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Adherence to screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  R B Kelly; J C Shank
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Factors associated with racial/ethnic differences in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Navkiran K Shokar; Carol A Carlson; Susan C Weller
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

View more
  4 in total

1.  Identifying barriers to colonoscopy screening for nonadherent African American participants in a patient navigation intervention.

Authors:  Jamilia R Sly; Tiffany Edwards; Rachel C Shelton; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2012-10-19

Review 2.  Community-based colorectal cancer screening trials with multi-ethnic groups: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jay B Morrow; Florence J Dallo; Manjula Julka
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-12

3.  Challenges to replicating evidence-based research in real-world settings: training African-American peers as patient navigators for colon cancer screening.

Authors:  Jamilia R Sly; Lina Jandorf; Rayhana Dhulkifl; Diana Hall; Tiffany Edwards; Adam J Goodman; Elithea Maysonet; Sulaiman Azeez
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Changes in colorectal cancer screening intention among people aged 18-49 in the United States.

Authors:  Mary L Greaney; Elaine Puleo; Kim Sprunck-Harrild; Sapna Syngal; Elizabeth Gonzalez Suarez; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.