Literature DB >> 22611271

Pharmacy students' perceptions of and attitudes towards peer assessment within a drug literature evaluation course.

Kimberly Wu1, Lindsay Davison, Amy Heck Sheehan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess pharmacy students' perceptions of and attitudes towards the use of peer assessment within a drug literature evaluation course.
METHODS: A 15-item, electronic survey instrument was sent to 158 second-year pharmacy students enrolled in a 2-credit required literature evaluation course at the Purdue University College of Pharmacy.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two (96.2%) responses were received. Approximately 95% of students agreed that they had the necessary skills to assess their peers and 91.8% agreed that their peers possessed these skills as well. More students agreed they were comfortable receiving feedback from peers (95.7%) than agreed they were comfortable providing feedback to peers (80%). The majority of students (91.9%) agreed that peer assessment was a skill they will use in their career as a pharmacist.
CONCLUSION: Students were more comfortable receiving feedback from peers than providing peer assessment. This skill is used by pharmacists throughout their career; therefore, students should become familiar and comfortable with the peer assessment process.

Keywords:  assessment; attitudes; peer assessment; peer evaluation; pharmacy students

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22611271      PMCID: PMC3355282          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe76462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  9 in total

Review 1.  Peer assessment: a missing link between teaching and learning? A review of the literature.

Authors:  J Morris
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  Anonymous peer assessment of medication management reviews.

Authors:  Iman A Basheti; Greg Ryan; Jim Woulfe; Kathryn Bartimote-Aufflick
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Medical students' views on peer assessment of professionalism.

Authors:  Louise Arnold; Carolyn K Shue; Barbara Kritt; Shiphra Ginsburg; David T Stern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Can there be a single system for peer assessment of professionalism among medical students? A multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Louise Arnold; Carolyn K Shue; Summers Kalishman; Michael Prislin; Charles Pohl; Henry Pohl; David T Stern
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Medical students' perceptions of peer feedback on an anatomy student-selected study module.

Authors:  Isaac D Gukas; Susan Miles; David J Heylings; Sam J Leinster
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Your role and responsibilities in the manuscript peer review process.

Authors:  Gayle A Brazeau; Joseph T Dipiro; Jack E Fincham; Bradley A Boucher; Timothy S Tracy
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Impact of peer assessment on the professional development of medical students: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anne C Nofziger; Elizabeth H Naumburg; Barbara J Davis; Christopher J Mooney; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Undergraduate medical student attitudes to the peer assessment of professional behaviours in two medical schools.

Authors:  Jayne Garner; Jean McKendree; Helen O'Sullivan; David Taylor
Journal:  Educ Prim Care       Date:  2010-01

9.  Intergroup peer assessment in problem-based learning tutorials for undergraduate pharmacy students.

Authors:  Vicky S Kritikos; Jim Woulfe; Maria B Sukkar; Bandana Saini
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Assessment of student performance and perceptions of learning in a medication use evaluation project.

Authors:  Robert D Beckett; Ozlem H Ersin; Yu-Chieh Chen
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  A workshop series using peer-grading to build drug information, writing, critical-thinking, and constructive feedback skills.

Authors:  Lindsay E Davis
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Student-peer mentoring on a drug information response.

Authors:  Jennifer Lin Rodis; Jennifer Backo; Brittany M Schmidt; Maria C Pruchnicki
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.047

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.