BACKGROUND: Better understanding the possible effects of vaccinating employees is important and can help policymakers and businesses plan vaccine distribution and administration logistics, especially with the current H1N1 influenza vaccine in short supply. PURPOSE: This article aims to determine the effects of varying vaccine coverage, compliance, administration rates, prioritization, and timing among employees during an influenza pandemic. METHODS: As part of the H1N1 influenza planning efforts of the Models of Infectious Disease Agent Study network, an agent-based computer simulation model was developed for the Washington DC metropolitan region, encompassing five metropolitan statistical areas. Each simulation run involved introducing 100 infectious individuals to initiate a 1.3 reproductive-rate (R(0)) epidemic, consistent with H1N1 parameters to date. Another set of scenarios represented a R(0)=1.6 epidemic. RESULTS: An unmitigated epidemic resulted in substantial productivity losses (a mean of $112.6 million for a serologic 15% attack rate and $193.8 million for a serologic 25% attack rate), even with the relatively low estimated mortality impact of H1N1. Although vaccinating Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices-defined priority groups resulted in the largest savings, vaccinating all remaining workers captured additional savings and, in fact, reduced healthcare workers' and critical infrastructure workers' chances of infection. Moreover, although employee vaccination compliance affected the epidemic, once 20% compliance was achieved, additional increases in compliance provided less incremental benefit. Even though a vast majority of the workplaces in the DC metropolitan region had fewer than 100 employees, focusing on vaccinating only those in larger firms (> or =100 employees) was just as effective in mitigating the epidemic as trying to vaccinate employees in all workplaces. CONCLUSIONS: Timely vaccination of at least 20% of the large-company workforce can play an important role in epidemic mitigation. Copyright (c) 2010 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Better understanding the possible effects of vaccinating employees is important and can help policymakers and businesses plan vaccine distribution and administration logistics, especially with the current H1N1influenza vaccine in short supply. PURPOSE: This article aims to determine the effects of varying vaccine coverage, compliance, administration rates, prioritization, and timing among employees during an influenza pandemic. METHODS: As part of the H1N1influenza planning efforts of the Models of Infectious Disease Agent Study network, an agent-based computer simulation model was developed for the Washington DC metropolitan region, encompassing five metropolitan statistical areas. Each simulation run involved introducing 100 infectious individuals to initiate a 1.3 reproductive-rate (R(0)) epidemic, consistent with H1N1 parameters to date. Another set of scenarios represented a R(0)=1.6 epidemic. RESULTS: An unmitigated epidemic resulted in substantial productivity losses (a mean of $112.6 million for a serologic 15% attack rate and $193.8 million for a serologic 25% attack rate), even with the relatively low estimated mortality impact of H1N1. Although vaccinating Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices-defined priority groups resulted in the largest savings, vaccinating all remaining workers captured additional savings and, in fact, reduced healthcare workers' and critical infrastructure workers' chances of infection. Moreover, although employee vaccination compliance affected the epidemic, once 20% compliance was achieved, additional increases in compliance provided less incremental benefit. Even though a vast majority of the workplaces in the DC metropolitan region had fewer than 100 employees, focusing on vaccinating only those in larger firms (> or =100 employees) was just as effective in mitigating the epidemic as trying to vaccinate employees in all workplaces. CONCLUSIONS: Timely vaccination of at least 20% of the large-company workforce can play an important role in epidemic mitigation. Copyright (c) 2010 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Stephen Eubank; Hasan Guclu; V S Anil Kumar; Madhav V Marathe; Aravind Srinivasan; Zoltán Toroczkai; Nan Wang Journal: Nature Date: 2004-05-13 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Derek Weycker; John Edelsberg; M Elizabeth Halloran; Ira M Longini; Azhar Nizam; Vincent Ciuryla; Gerry Oster Journal: Vaccine Date: 2005-01-26 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: M Elizabeth Halloran; Neil M Ferguson; Stephen Eubank; Ira M Longini; Derek A T Cummings; Bryan Lewis; Shufu Xu; Christophe Fraser; Anil Vullikanti; Timothy C Germann; Diane Wagener; Richard Beckman; Kai Kadau; Chris Barrett; Catherine A Macken; Donald S Burke; Philip Cooley Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Simon Cauchemez; Alain-Jacques Valleron; Pierre-Yves Boëlle; Antoine Flahault; Neil M Ferguson Journal: Nature Date: 2008-04-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Yang Yang; Jonathan D Sugimoto; M Elizabeth Halloran; Nicole E Basta; Dennis L Chao; Laura Matrajt; Gail Potter; Eben Kenah; Ira M Longini Journal: Science Date: 2009-09-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: S Smith; V Demicheli; C Di Pietrantonj; A R Harnden; T Jefferson; N J Matheson; A Rivetti Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2006-01-25
Authors: Neil M Ferguson; Derek A T Cummings; Christophe Fraser; James C Cajka; Philip C Cooley; Donald S Burke Journal: Nature Date: 2006-04-26 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Christophe Fraser; Christl A Donnelly; Simon Cauchemez; William P Hanage; Maria D Van Kerkhove; T Déirdre Hollingsworth; Jamie Griffin; Rebecca F Baggaley; Helen E Jenkins; Emily J Lyons; Thibaut Jombart; Wes R Hinsley; Nicholas C Grassly; Francois Balloux; Azra C Ghani; Neil M Ferguson; Andrew Rambaut; Oliver G Pybus; Hugo Lopez-Gatell; Celia M Alpuche-Aranda; Ietza Bojorquez Chapela; Ethel Palacios Zavala; Dulce Ma Espejo Guevara; Francesco Checchi; Erika Garcia; Stephane Hugonnet; Cathy Roth Journal: Science Date: 2009-05-11 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Bruce Y Lee; Tina-Marie Assi; Jayant Rajgopal; Bryan A Norman; Sheng-I Chen; Shawn T Brown; Rachel B Slayton; Souleymane Kone; Hailu Kenea; Joel S Welling; Diana L Connor; Angela R Wateska; Anirban Jana; Ann E Wiringa; Willem G Van Panhuis; Donald S Burke Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-11-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Tina-Marie Assi; Korngamon Rookkapan; Jayant Rajgopal; Vorasith Sornsrivichai; Shawn T Brown; Joel S Welling; Bryan A Norman; Diana L Connor; Sheng-I Chen; Rachel B Slayton; Yongjua Laosiritaworn; Angela R Wateska; Stephen R Wisniewski; Bruce Y Lee Journal: Vaccine Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Michael A Yonas; Jessica G Burke; Shawn T Brown; Jeffrey D Borrebach; Richard Garland; Donald S Burke; John J Grefenstette Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2013-10
Authors: Jessica G Burke; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Jennifer Watling Neal; Helen I Meissner; Michael Yonas; Patricia L Mabry Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2015-06
Authors: Bruce Y Lee; Sarah M Bartsch; Yeeli Mui; Leila A Haidari; Marie L Spiker; Joel Gittelsohn Journal: Nutr Rev Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 7.110
Authors: Jay V DePasse; Kenneth J Smith; Jonathan M Raviotta; Eunha Shim; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Richard K Zimmerman; Shawn T Brown Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Sabine Wicker; Holger F Rabenau; Harald Bias; David A Groneberg; René Gottschalk Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 2.646