Literature DB >> 20039999

Increased opportunity for sexual conflict promotes harmful males with elevated courtship frequencies.

H S Crudgington1, S Fellows, R R Snook.   

Abstract

Mating systems have a profound influence on the probability of conflict occurring between the sexes. Promiscuity is predicted to generate sexual conflict, thereby driving the evolution of male traits that harm females, whereas monogamy is expected to foster reproductive cooperation, thus rendering such traits redundant. We tested these predictions using experimentally evolved Drosophila pseudoobscura subject to different mating systems. Female survival was not influenced by the mating system treatment of her partner. However, females continuously housed with males evolving under elevated opportunities for female promiscuity produced fewer total progeny, but a relatively greater number of progeny early in their lives, than females housed with males evolving under obligate monogamy. We also found that promiscuous males courted females more frequently than monogamous males. Variation in male courtship frequency and progeny production patterns among treatments reinforces the critical importance of mating system variation for sexual conflict, during both pre- and post-copulatory interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20039999     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01907.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  17 in total

1.  Female, but not male, nematodes evolve under experimental sexual coevolution.

Authors:  K Fritzsche; N Timmermeyer; M Wolter; N K Michiels
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation.

Authors:  Luke Holman; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.

Authors:  B Hollis; D Houle
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Evolution of mate-harm, longevity and behaviour in male fruit flies subjected to different levels of interlocus conflict.

Authors:  Bodhisatta Nandy; Vanika Gupta; Sharmi Sen; Niveda Udaykumar; Manas Arun Samant; Syed Zeeshan Ali; Nagaraj Guru Prasad
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Mating system variation drives rapid evolution of the female transcriptome in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Elina Immonen; Rhonda R Snook; Michael G Ritchie
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Precopulatory but not postcopulatory male reproductive traits diverge in response to mating system manipulation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kristina U Wensing; Mareike Koppik; Claudia Fricke
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Mating system manipulation and the evolution of sex-biased gene expression in Drosophila.

Authors:  Paris Veltsos; Yongxiang Fang; Andrew R Cossins; Rhonda R Snook; Michael G Ritchie
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Evolution of divergent female mating preference in response to experimental sexual selection.

Authors:  Allan Debelle; Michael G Ritchie; Rhonda R Snook
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  No evidence that within-group male relatedness reduces harm to females in Drosophila.

Authors:  Brian Hollis; Tadeusz J Kawecki; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Successful mating and hybridisation in two closely related flatworm species despite significant differences in reproductive morphology and behaviour.

Authors:  Pragya Singh; Daniel N Ballmer; Max Laubscher; Lukas Schärer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.