Literature DB >> 20039120

Defining replication origin efficiency using DNA fiber assays.

Sandie Tuduri1, Hélène Tourrière, Philippe Pasero.   

Abstract

The timely duplication of eukaryotic genomes depends on the coordinated activation of thousands of replication origins distributed along the chromosomes. Origin activation follows a temporal program that is imposed by the chromosomal context and is under the control of S-phase checkpoints. Although the general mechanisms regulating DNA replication are now well-understood at the level of individual origins, little is known on the coordination of thousands of initiation events at a genome-wide level. Recent studies using DNA combing and other single-molecule assays have shown that eukaryotic genomes contain a large excess of replication origins. Most of these origins remain "dormant" in normal growth conditions but are activated when fork progression is impeded. In this review, we discuss how DNA fiber technologies have changed our view of eukaryotic replication programs and how origin redundancy contributes to the maintenance of genome integrity in eukaryotic cells.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20039120     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-009-9098-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  64 in total

1.  GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks.

Authors:  Agnieszka Gambus; Richard C Jones; Alberto Sanchez-Diaz; Masato Kanemaki; Frederick van Deursen; Ricky D Edmondson; Karim Labib
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Excess MCM proteins protect human cells from replicative stress by licensing backup origins of replication.

Authors:  Arkaitz Ibarra; Etienne Schwob; Juan Méndez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Replication fork density increases during DNA synthesis in X. laevis egg extracts.

Authors:  J Herrick; P Stanislawski; O Hyrien; A Bensimon
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-07-28       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  The structure and function of yeast ARS elements.

Authors:  C S Newlon; J F Theis
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  Replication dynamics of the yeast genome.

Authors:  M K Raghuraman; E A Winzeler; D Collingwood; S Hunt; L Wodicka; A Conway; D J Lockhart; R W Davis; B J Brewer; W L Fangman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A homologous recombination defect affects replication-fork progression in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Fayza Daboussi; Sylvain Courbet; Simone Benhamou; Patricia Kannouche; Malgorzata Z Zdzienicka; Michelle Debatisse; Bernard S Lopez
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  The RecQ helicase WRN is required for normal replication fork progression after DNA damage or replication fork arrest.

Authors:  Julia M Sidorova; Nianzhen Li; Albert Folch; Raymond J Monnat
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Replicon clusters are stable units of chromosome structure: evidence that nuclear organization contributes to the efficient activation and propagation of S phase in human cells.

Authors:  D A Jackson; A Pombo
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-03-23       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Chk1 regulates the density of active replication origins during the vertebrate S phase.

Authors:  Apolinar Maya-Mendoza; Eva Petermann; David A F Gillespie; Keith W Caldecott; Dean A Jackson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  DNA replication timing is deterministic at the level of chromosomal domains but stochastic at the level of replicons in Xenopus egg extracts.

Authors:  Hélène Labit; Irène Perewoska; Thomas Germe; Olivier Hyrien; Kathrin Marheineke
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Pathways of mammalian replication fork restart.

Authors:  Eva Petermann; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  S-phase progression in mammalian cells: modelling the influence of nuclear organization.

Authors:  Alex Shaw; Pedro Olivares-Chauvet; Apolinar Maya-Mendoza; Dean A Jackson
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Exploiting replicative stress to treat cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Dobbelstein; Claus Storgaard Sørensen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 4.  The BLM dissolvasome in DNA replication and repair.

Authors:  Kelly A Manthei; James L Keck
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  The essential kinase ATR: ensuring faithful duplication of a challenging genome.

Authors:  Joshua C Saldivar; David Cortez; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 6.  Evaluating genome-scale approaches to eukaryotic DNA replication.

Authors:  David M Gilbert
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Mathematical modeling of genome replication.

Authors:  Renata Retkute; Conrad A Nieduszynski; Alessandro de Moura
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2012-09-17

8.  A comprehensive genome-wide map of autonomously replicating sequences in a naive genome.

Authors:  Ivan Liachko; Anand Bhaskar; Chanmi Lee; Shau Chee Claire Chung; Bik-Kwoon Tye; Uri Keich
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Mathematical modelling of whole chromosome replication.

Authors:  Alessandro P S de Moura; Renata Retkute; Michelle Hawkins; Conrad A Nieduszynski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A role for USP7 in DNA replication.

Authors:  Madhav Jagannathan; Tin Nguyen; David Gallo; Niharika Luthra; Grant W Brown; Vivian Saridakis; Lori Frappier
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.