Literature DB >> 18089650

A homologous recombination defect affects replication-fork progression in mammalian cells.

Fayza Daboussi1, Sylvain Courbet, Simone Benhamou, Patricia Kannouche, Malgorzata Z Zdzienicka, Michelle Debatisse, Bernard S Lopez.   

Abstract

Faithful genome transmission requires a network of pathways coordinating DNA replication to DNA repair and recombination. Here, we used molecular combing to measure the impact of homologous recombination (HR) on the velocity of DNA replication forks. We used three hamster cell lines defective in HR either by overexpression of a RAD51 dominant-negative form, or by a defect in the RAD51 paralogue XRCC2 or the breast tumor suppressor BRCA2. Irrespectively of the type or extent of HR alteration, all three cell lines exhibited a similar reduction in the rate of replication-fork progression, associated with an increase in the density of replication forks. Importantly, this phenotype was completely reversed in complemented derivatives of Xrcc2 and Brca2 mutants. These data reveal a novel role for HR, different from the reactivation of stalled replication forks, which may play an important role in genome stability and thus in tumor protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18089650     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.010330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  32 in total

1.  RMI1 promotes DNA replication fork progression and recovery from replication fork stress.

Authors:  Jay Yang; Lara O'Donnell; Daniel Durocher; Grant W Brown
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Rad51 recombinase prevents Mre11 nuclease-dependent degradation and excessive PrimPol-mediated elongation of nascent DNA after UV irradiation.

Authors:  María Belén Vallerga; Sabrina F Mansilla; María Belén Federico; Agustina P Bertolin; Vanesa Gottifredi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Spontaneous slow replication fork progression elicits mitosis alterations in homologous recombination-deficient mammalian cells.

Authors:  Therese Wilhelm; Indiana Magdalou; Aurélia Barascu; Hervé Técher; Michelle Debatisse; Bernard S Lopez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Defining replication origin efficiency using DNA fiber assays.

Authors:  Sandie Tuduri; Hélène Tourrière; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Rad51 regulates cell cycle progression by preserving G2/M transition in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Yoon; Dae-Kwan Kim; Keun Pil Kim; Kyung-Soon Park
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.272

6.  Temporal differences in DNA replication during the S phase using single fiber analysis of normal human fibroblasts and glioblastoma T98G cells.

Authors:  Rebecca A Frum; Zakaria S Khondker; David G Kaufman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Peptide aptamer mimicking RAD51-binding domain of BRCA2 inhibits DNA damage repair and survival in Trypanosoma brucei.

Authors:  Mack Hall; Smita Misra; Minu Chaudhuri; Gautam Chaudhuri
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Use of the DNA fiber spreading technique to detect the effects of mutant p53 on DNA replication.

Authors:  Rebecca A Frum; Sumitra Deb; Swati Palit Deb
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

Review 9.  Identification of early replicating fragile sites that contribute to genome instability.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Barlow; Robert B Faryabi; Elsa Callén; Nancy Wong; Amy Malhowski; Hua Tang Chen; Gustavo Gutierrez-Cruz; Hong-Wei Sun; Peter McKinnon; George Wright; Rafael Casellas; Davide F Robbiani; Louis Staudt; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  DNA replication in early S phase pauses near newly activated origins.

Authors:  Rebecca A Frum; Paul D Chastain; Pingping Qu; Stephanie M Cohen; David G Kaufman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.