Literature DB >> 2003626

The validity of health risk appraisals for coronary heart disease: results from a randomized field trial.

K W Smith1, S M McKinlay, J B McKinlay.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While health risk appraisals (HRAs) are becoming increasingly popular as tools for health assessment and health education, comparatively little is known about the accuracy of these risk estimates.
METHODS: A field trial among 732 randomly selected adults ages 25 to 65 years was conducted to assess the validity of the risk scores produced by four widely used HRAs.
RESULTS: Self-reported HRA risk scores for cigarette smoking and relative weight were generally accurate, but correlations between physiological measurements and scores for blood pressure, cholesterol, and physical activity were always lower than .51. Correlations between epidemiologic estimates of the probability of CHD death and HRA total risk scores ranged from .13 to .75; partial correlations adjusting for age, race, and gender ranged from .12 to .47.
CONCLUSIONS: The HRAs chosen for the field trial exhibited modest correlations with the CHD mortality risk predicted by the epidemiologic model. Mathematical errors made by respondents completing self-scored instruments and lack of knowledge regarding physiologic status decrease the accuracy of HRA risk estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2003626      PMCID: PMC1405058          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.81.4.466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  10 in total

1.  Representativeness of the Framingham risk model for coronary heart disease mortality: a comparison with a national cohort study.

Authors:  P E Leaverton; P D Sorlie; J C Kleinman; A L Dannenberg; L Ingster-Moore; W B Kannel; J C Cornoni-Huntley
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

2.  Physical activity, all-cause mortality, and longevity of college alumni.

Authors:  R S Paffenbarger; R T Hyde; A L Wing; C C Hsieh
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Appraising health risk appraisal.

Authors:  V J Schoenbach
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The validity of health risk appraisal instruments for assessing coronary heart disease risk.

Authors:  K W Smith; S M McKinlay; B D Thorington
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic.

Authors:  M Maclure; W C Willett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Frequency of worksite health promotion activities.

Authors:  J E Fielding; P V Piserchia
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The reliability of health risk appraisals: a field trial of four instruments.

Authors:  K W Smith; S M McKinlay; J B McKinlay
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance.

Authors:  M S Kramer; A R Feinstein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Appraising the health of health risk appraisal.

Authors:  J E Fielding
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  The accuracy of health risk appraisal in predicting mortality.

Authors:  B Foxman; D W Edington
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.308

  10 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  S Ebrahim; A Beswick; M Burke; G Davey Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

2.  Vitamin E intake, alpha-tocopherol status, and pancreatic cancer in a cohort of male smokers.

Authors:  Rachael Z Stolzenberg-Solomon; Seth Sheffler-Collins; Stephanie Weinstein; David H Garabrant; Satu Mannisto; Philip Taylor; Jarmo Virtamo; Demetrius Albanes
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Predictive accuracy of a health risk appraisal program using mortality risk age in 116,927 Korean men.

Authors:  Ju-Young Kim; Byung-Joo Park; Yoon Kim; Jin-Ho Park; Be-Long Cho
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Value of laboratory tests in employer-sponsored health risk assessments for newly identifying health conditions: analysis of 52,270 participants.

Authors:  Harvey W Kaufman; Fred R Williams; Mouneer A Odeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The utility of a health risk assessment in providing care for a rural free clinic population.

Authors:  Paula D Scariati; Cyndy Williams
Journal:  Osteopath Med Prim Care       Date:  2007-03-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.