Literature DB >> 2909175

Frequency of worksite health promotion activities.

J E Fielding1, P V Piserchia.   

Abstract

The first National Survey of Worksite Health Promotion Activities surveyed a random sample of all private sector worksites with 50 or more employees, stratified by number of employers, geographic location, and type of industry. The 1,358 completed interviews constituted a response rate of 83.1 per cent. Of responding worksites 65.5 per cent had one or more areas of health promotion activity with slightly more than 50 per cent of activities initiated within the previous five years. Overall prevalence by type of activity included health risk assessment (29.5 per cent), smoking cessation (35.6 per cent), blood pressure control and treatment (16.5 per cent), exercise/fitness (22.1 per cent), weight control (14.7 per cent), nutrition education (16.8 per cent), stress management (26.6 per cent), back problem prevention and care (28.5 per cent), and off-the-job accident prevention (19.8 per cent). Mean number of activities across all worksites was 2.1 and for worksites with activities, 3.2. Activity frequency increased with worksite size, was highest in the western region (2.34) and lowest in the northeast (1.96), and varied considerably by industry type. The majority of worksites paid the entire cost of these activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2909175      PMCID: PMC1349460          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.79.1.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  14 in total

1.  Designing a successful hypertension control program.

Authors:  A Foote; J C Erfurt
Journal:  Bus Health       Date:  1984-03

2.  Assessing health: what can employers do?

Authors:  J E Fielding; L M Alexandre
Journal:  Bus Health       Date:  1984-03

3.  Health promotion and disease prevention: improving health while conserving resources.

Authors:  R J Knobel
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  1983-02

4.  Worksite health promotion: fact or fantasy.

Authors:  R H Rosen
Journal:  Corp Comment       Date:  1984-06

5.  Some health benefits of physical activity. The Framingham Study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; P Sorlie
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1979-08

6.  Health promotion programs sponsored by California employers.

Authors:  J E Fielding; L Breslow
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Effectiveness of employee health improvement programs.

Authors:  J E Fielding
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1982-11

8.  Worksite health promotion in Colorado.

Authors:  M F Davis; K Rosenberg; D C Iverson; T M Vernon; J Bauer
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 9.  Health promotion and disease prevention at the worksite.

Authors:  J E Fielding
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 21.981

10.  The INSURE project on lifecycle preventive health services.

Authors:  D N Logsdon; M A Rosen; M M Demak
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

View more
  15 in total

1.  Employee and organizational factors associated with participation in an incentive-based worksite smoking cessation program.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; J F Hollis; D V Ary; H A Lando
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1990-08

2.  The validity of health risk appraisals for coronary heart disease: results from a randomized field trial.

Authors:  K W Smith; S M McKinlay; J B McKinlay
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Workplace compliance with a no-smoking law: a randomized community intervention trial.

Authors:  N A Rigotti; D Bourne; A Rosen; J A Locke; T C Schelling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Worksite health promotion in four Midwest cities.

Authors:  R R Weisbrod; P L Pirie; N F Bracht; P Elstun
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1991-06

5.  Current status of health promotion activities in four midwest cities.

Authors:  R R Weisbrod; N F Bracht; P L Pirie; S Veblen-Mortenson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Effects of a Dutch work-site wellness-health program: the Brabantia Project.

Authors:  S Maes; C Verhoeven; F Kittel; H Scholten
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through worksites and families in the treatwell 5-a-day study.

Authors:  G Sorensen; A Stoddard; K Peterson; N Cohen; M K Hunt; E Stein; R Palombo; R Lederman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Worksite health promotion.

Authors:  C Levenstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Occupation as a risk identifier for breast cancer.

Authors:  C H Rubin; C A Burnett; W E Halperin; P J Seligman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Comprehensive health evaluation of workers in the ceramics industry.

Authors:  J Huang; E Shibata; Y Takeuchi; H Okutani
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1993-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.