Literature DB >> 20035173

No difference in functional and radiographic results 8.4 years after quadricortical compared with tricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures.

Annette K B Wikerøy1, Per R Høiness, Geir S Andreassen, Johan C Hellund, Jan Erik Madsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term functional and radiologic results after two types of syndesmosis fixation, comparing one quadricortical syndesmotic screw fixation with two tricortical screw fixation in ankle fractures.
DESIGN: Follow up of a previously conducted prospective, randomized clinical study.
SETTING: University clinic, Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Forty-eight patients with closed ankle fractures and concomitant syndesmotic rupture were operated on with quadricortical (n = 23) or tricortical (n = 25) syndesmotic fixation.
RESULTS: Follow-up time was 8.4 years (range, 7.7-8.9 years). There were no statistical differences in the two groups regarding Olerud-Molander Ankle score, Orthopaedic Trauma Association score, or degree of osteoarthritis. Patients with a difference in the syndesmotic width between the operated and the nonoperated ankle of 1.5 mm or more showed a tendency toward poorer functional results (P = 0.056). Twenty-one patients showed synostosis on plain radiographs. Of these, only seven patients had synostosis verified on computed tomography, all of whom had significantly worse function. Patients with a posterior fracture fragment at time of operation had poorer Olerud-Molander Ankle score (73.1 versus 85, P = 0.05) and all had osteoarthritis as compared with 55% of those without a posterior fragment. Obese patients (body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2) also had poorer Orthopaedic Trauma Association score, but neither obesity nor being overweight predicted late arthritis.
CONCLUSIONS: Follow up 8.4 years after surgery of ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury showed satisfactory functional results with only minor differences between the two groups of syndesmotic fixation. Obese patients had significantly poorer functional results. The presence of a posterior fracture fragment was an important negative prognostic factor regarding functional results. Plain radiographs overestimated tibiofibular synostosis. Synostosis on computed tomography, however, predicted impaired ankle function. A difference in syndesmotic width 1.5 mm or greater between the two ankles seemed to be associated with an inferior clinical result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20035173     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181bedca1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  34 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of syndesmotic diastasis: emphasis on effect of syndesmotic screw on ankle function.

Authors:  Yi-Ton Hsu; Chi-Chuan Wu; Wei-Cheun Lee; Kuo-Feng Fan; I-Chuan Tseng; Po-Cheng Lee
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Sagittal ankle position does not affect axial CT measurements of the syndesmosis in a cadaveric model.

Authors:  Ashley E Levack; Aleksey Dvorzhinskiy; Elizabeth B Gausden; Matthew R Garner; Stephen J Warner; Peter D Fabricant; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  A Novel Indirect Reduction Technique in Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Christopher T Cosgrove; Amanda G Spraggs-Hughes; Sara M Putnam; William M Ricci; Anna N Miller; Christopher M McAndrew; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Reply to Letter regarding article by Wang et al: "Internal fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis".

Authors:  Chen Wang; Xin Ma; Xu Wang; Jiazhang Huang; Chao Zhang; Li Chen; Jian Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries.

Authors:  S Rammelt; P Obruba
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Reply to comment on Schepers: acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair.

Authors:  Tim Schepers
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Comment on Schepers: acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair.

Authors:  Tyler Van Heest
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  In Vivo Syndesmotic Overcompression After Fixation of Ankle Fractures With a Syndesmotic Injury.

Authors:  Steven M Cherney; Jacob A Haynes; Amanda G Spraggs-Hughes; Christopher M McAndrew; William M Ricci; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 9.  Fractures of the ankle joint: investigation and treatment options.

Authors:  Hans Goost; Matthias D Wimmer; Alexej Barg; Kouroush Kabir; Victor Valderrabano; Christof Burger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  The use of TightRope fixation for ankle syndesmosis injuries: our experience.

Authors:  M Bondi; N Rossi; A Pizzoli; L Renzi Brivio
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.