Ashley E Levack1, Aleksey Dvorzhinskiy2, Elizabeth B Gausden2, Matthew R Garner3, Stephen J Warner4, Peter D Fabricant5, Dean G Lorich6. 1. Department of Academic Training, Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. levacka@hss.edu. 2. Department of Academic Training, Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. 3. Penn State College of Medicine and Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA. 4. Orthopaedic Trauma Service, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA. 5. Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA. 6. Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ankle plantarflexion and the axial location of measurement on quantitative syndesmosis assessment. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were secured in three positions of ankle plantarflexion (0°, 15°, and 30°) using an ankle-spanning external fixator and underwent CT scans at each position. Syndesmotic measurements were obtained on axial images using three previously described methods (six measurements) at the level of the tibial plafond and 1 cm proximal to the plafond. Method 1 evaluated the distance between the most anterior and posterior aspects of the fibula and tibia. Method 2 measured medial-lateral diastasis of the anterior and posterior aspects of the fibula, and fibular anterior-posterior translation. Method 3 evaluated axial rotation of the fibula. All measurements were performed by two independent observers. Inter-rater reliability of each measurement was evaluated using intra-class coefficients. Repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) was performed to evaluate within-specimen differences in measurements obtained at varying ankle positions. RESULTS: The anterior incisura component of method 1 demonstrated poor-to-moderate inter-rater reliability across all ankle positions and at both measurement locations. Inter-rater reliability was highest for method 2, especially when measured 1 cm proximal to the plafond. Method 3 demonstrated moderate reliability 1 cm proximal to the plafond. After correcting for multiple comparisons, RM-ANOVA and pairwise analysis revealed that none of the measurements changed significantly with varying ankle position. CONCLUSION: The inter-rater reliability of the most common method of syndesmotic evaluation (method 1) was found to be lower than in previous studies. The most reliable syndesmotic evaluation can be made by measuring diastasis and anteroposterior translation 1 cm proximal to the plafond (method 2). Ankle position from 0° to 30° of plantarflexion did not change the measurements obtained. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ankle plantarflexion and the axial location of measurement on quantitative syndesmosis assessment. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were secured in three positions of ankle plantarflexion (0°, 15°, and 30°) using an ankle-spanning external fixator and underwent CT scans at each position. Syndesmotic measurements were obtained on axial images using three previously described methods (six measurements) at the level of the tibial plafond and 1 cm proximal to the plafond. Method 1 evaluated the distance between the most anterior and posterior aspects of the fibula and tibia. Method 2 measured medial-lateral diastasis of the anterior and posterior aspects of the fibula, and fibular anterior-posterior translation. Method 3 evaluated axial rotation of the fibula. All measurements were performed by two independent observers. Inter-rater reliability of each measurement was evaluated using intra-class coefficients. Repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) was performed to evaluate within-specimen differences in measurements obtained at varying ankle positions. RESULTS: The anterior incisura component of method 1 demonstrated poor-to-moderate inter-rater reliability across all ankle positions and at both measurement locations. Inter-rater reliability was highest for method 2, especially when measured 1 cm proximal to the plafond. Method 3 demonstrated moderate reliability 1 cm proximal to the plafond. After correcting for multiple comparisons, RM-ANOVA and pairwise analysis revealed that none of the measurements changed significantly with varying ankle position. CONCLUSION: The inter-rater reliability of the most common method of syndesmotic evaluation (method 1) was found to be lower than in previous studies. The most reliable syndesmotic evaluation can be made by measuring diastasis and anteroposterior translation 1 cm proximal to the plafond (method 2). Ankle position from 0° to 30° of plantarflexion did not change the measurements obtained. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Authors: Michael J Gardner; Demetris Demetrakopoulos; Stephen M Briggs; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 2.827
Authors: J G Kennedy; K E Soffe; P Dalla Vedova; M M Stephens; T O'Brien; M G Walsh; F McManus Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2000 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Merel F N Birnie; Kaz L J van Schilt; Fay R K Sanders; Peter Kloen; Tim Schepers Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Markus Beck; Manuela Brunk; Alice Wichelhaus; Thomas Mittlmeier; Robert Rotter Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2021-01-26 Impact factor: 2.362