Literature DB >> 29738403

A Novel Indirect Reduction Technique in Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: A Cadaveric Study.

Christopher T Cosgrove1, Amanda G Spraggs-Hughes1, Sara M Putnam1, William M Ricci1, Anna N Miller1, Christopher M McAndrew1, Michael J Gardner2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel technique using preoperative computed tomography (CT) to plan clamp tine placement along the trans-syndesmotic axis (TSA). We hypothesized that preoperative CT imaging provides a reliable template on which to plan optimal clamp tine positioning along the TSA, reducing malreduction rates compared with other described techniques.
METHODS: CT images of 48 cadaveric through-knee specimens were obtained, and the TSA was measured as well as the optimal position of the medial clamp tine. The syndesmosis was then fully destabilized. Indirect clamp reductions were performed with the medial clamp tine placed at positions 10 degrees anterior to the TSA, along the TSA, and at both 10 and 20 degrees posterior to the TSA. The specimens were then separately reduced using manual digital pressure and palpation alone. CT was performed after each clamp and manual reduction.
RESULTS: On average, reduction clamp tines were within 3 ± 2 degrees of the desired angle and within 5% ± 4% of the templated location along the tibial line for all clamp reduction attempts. Palpation and direct visualization produced the overall lowest malreduction rates in all measurements: 4.9% and 3.0%, respectively. Off-axis clamping 10 degrees anterior or 20 degrees posterior to the patient-specific TSA demonstrated an increased overall malreduction rate: 15.8% and 11.3%, respectively. Significantly more over-compression occurred when a reduction clamp was used versus manual digital reduction alone (8.6% vs. 0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Reduction clamp placement directly along an optimal clamping vector can be facilitated by preoperative CT measurements of the uninjured ankle. However, even in this setting, the use of reduction clamps increases the risk for syndesmotic malreduction and over-compression compared with manual digital reduction or direct visualization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29738403      PMCID: PMC6008185          DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  43 in total

1.  Overtightening of the ankle syndesmosis: is it really possible?

Authors:  P Tornetta; J E Spoo; F A Reynolds; C Lee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture.

Authors:  Mélissa Laflamme; Etienne L Belzile; Luc Bédard; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Mark Glazebrook; Stéphane Pelet
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  A computed tomography evaluation of two hundred normal ankles, to ascertain what anatomical landmarks to use when compressing or placing an ankle syndesmosis screw.

Authors:  M T Kennedy; O Carmody; S Leong; C Kennedy; M Dolan
Journal:  Foot (Edinb)       Date:  2014-07-23

4.  Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Demetris Demetrakopoulos; Stephen M Briggs; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures.

Authors:  Brad Weening; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  The effects of rotation on radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis.

Authors:  Spiros G Pneumaticos; Philip C Noble; Sofia N Chatziioannou; Saul G Trevino
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.827

7.  Radiographic and CT evaluation of tibiofibular syndesmotic diastasis: a cadaver study.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; J Lu; H Yang; A O Mekhail; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.827

8.  The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  H Claude Sagi; Anjan R Shah; Roy W Sanders
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  The tibiofibular line: an anatomical feature to diagnose syndesmosis malposition.

Authors:  Peter Blair Gifford; Michael Lutz
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 10.  Ankle syndesmotic injury.

Authors:  Charalampos Zalavras; David Thordarson
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.020

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of isolated acute instability of the syndesmosis treated with arthroscopy and percutaneous suture-button fixation.

Authors:  Danilo Ryuko Cândido Nishikawa; Guilherme Honda Saito; Adilson Sanches de Oliveira Junior; Alberto Abussamra Moreira Mendes; Leticia Piovesana Devito; Marcelo Pires Prado
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Intraoperative Assessment of Reduction of the Ankle Syndesmosis.

Authors:  Kevin A Hao; Robert A Vander Griend; Jennifer A Nichols; Christopher W Reb
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-07-13

3.  Is the Fibular Station on Lateral Ankle Radiographs Symmetric? A Retrospective Observational Radiographic Study.

Authors:  Patrick J Kellam; Graham J Dekeyser; Travis L Bailey; Justin M Haller; David L Rothberg; Thomas F Higgins; Lucas S Marchand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Four-Dimensional CT Analysis of Normal Syndesmotic Motion.

Authors:  Murray T Wong; Charmaine Wiens; Jeremy Lamothe; W Brent Edwards; Prism S Schneider
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.827

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.