Literature DB >> 20034731

TrueFISP imaging of the pineal gland: more cysts and more abnormalities.

Ingo Nolte1, Marc A Brockmann, Lars Gerigk, Christoph Groden, Johann Scharf.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although pineal cysts are found with a frequency of over one third in autopsy series, prevalences reported in standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies only range between 0.14% and 4.9%. With the advances in scanner technology and more sensitive high-resolution 3D-sequences, pineal cysts with atypical appearance are more frequently encountered as an incidental finding. In order to help the radiologist and the clinician to correctly interpret these incidental findings and to avoid follow-up MRI or even surgical intervention, we analysed the frequency of typical and atypical pineal cysts using standard MRI-sequences and a high-resolution 3D-trueFISP-sequence (true-Fast-Imaging-with-Steady-State-Precession).
METHODS: In 111 patients undergoing MRI we analysed the prevalence of pineal cysts in relation to gender and age, as well as the frequency of atypical cysts defined by thickened rim, trabeculations, or asymmetric form using three standard MRI-sequences (T1-SE (T1 weighted spin echo), T2-TSE (T2 weighted turbo spin echo), FLAIR (fluid attenuated inversion recovery)) and compared the diagnostic certainty of these standard sequences with the sensitivity of a high-resolution trueFISP MRI sequence.
RESULTS: Using trueFISP pineal cysts were detected more frequently than in the standard sequences (35.1% vs. 9.0% (T1-SE), 4.5% (T2-TSE) and 9.0% (FLAIR)). Diagnostic uncertainty was least frequent in trueFISP. In trueFISP, 41.0% of the detected cysts showed one or more features of atypical cysts (standard sequences: 21.4%). Highest prevalence of cysts was detected in the group of 20-30-year-old patients and decreased with increasing age.
CONCLUSION: High-resolution 3D-sequences like trueFISP increase the detection rate of pineal cysts to levels reported in autoptic series while decreasing the diagnostic uncertainty. Atypically configurated pineal cysts are frequently detected as an incidental finding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20034731     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  10 in total

1.  TrueFISP of the pediatric pineal gland: volumetric and microstructural analysis.

Authors:  J M Bumb; M A Brockmann; C Groden; M Al-Zghloul; I Nölte
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 3.649

2.  Microstructural analysis of pineal volume using trueFISP imaging.

Authors:  Jan M Bumb; Marc A Brockmann; Christoph Groden; Ingo Nolte
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-04-28

3.  Follow-up of pineal cysts in children: is it necessary?

Authors:  Miro-Pekka Jussila; Päivi Olsén; Niina Salokorpi; Maria Suo-Palosaari
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  In vivo characterization of changing blood-tumor barrier permeability in a mouse model of breast cancer metastasis: a complementary magnetic resonance imaging approach.

Authors:  Dean B Percy; Emeline J Ribot; Yuhua Chen; Catherine McFadden; Carmen Simedrea; Patricia S Steeg; Ann F Chambers; Paula J Foster
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 5.  Pineal cysts in children: case-based update.

Authors:  Gokmen Kahilogullari; Luca Massimi; Concezio Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Structural and Volumetric Brain MRI Findings in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  J B Patel; S H Wilson; T R Oakes; P Santhanam; L K Weaver
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Assessment of Pineal Gland Volume and Calcification in Healthy Subjects: Is it Related to Aging?

Authors:  Mehtap Beker-Acay; Ozan Turamanlar; Erdal Horata; Ebru Unlu; Nurdan Fidan; Serdar Oruc
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 1.894

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of pineal gland calcification.

Authors:  Lisa C Adams; Sarah M Böker; Yvonne Y Bender; Gerd Diederichs; Eva M Fallenberg; Moritz Wagner; Bernd Hamm; Marcus R Makowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Pineal Gland Volume in Major Depressive and Bipolar Disorders.

Authors:  Tsutomu Takahashi; Daiki Sasabayashi; Murat Yücel; Sarah Whittle; Valentina Lorenzetti; Mark Walterfang; Michio Suzuki; Christos Pantelis; Gin S Malhi; Nicholas B Allen
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Pineal Cyst Apoplexy: A Rare Complication of Common Entity.

Authors:  El Kim; Sae Min Kwon
Journal:  Brain Tumor Res Treat       Date:  2020-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.